Fiscal Year 1999 qH: 7 -i - * � m (1 Octor 18 30 S a Vom a Part 2 of 2 E S~ TABLE OF CONTENTS Northwestern Division Omaha, NE, District ............................................ Kansas City, MO, District ............................................ Portland, OR, District ............................................ Seattle, W A, District ............................................ Walla Walla, WA, District ............................................ Pacific Ocean Division Honolulu, HI, District ........................................ .. Alaska D istrict ........................................... South Pacific Division Los Angeles, CA, District ............................................ San Francisco, CA, District ........................................... Sacramento, CA, District ............................................ California Debris Commission ....................................... Albuquerque, NM, District ............................................ Southwestern Division Little Rock, AR, District ................ .......................... Tulsa, OK, District ........................................... Fort W orth, TX, District .... ....... ......................... Galveston, TX, District ........................................... Mississippi River Commission ............................................ Engineer Research and Development Center .................................. W ater Resources Support Center ......................................... Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses ............................................ International Boundary Water Boards ....................................... Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act ............................ Regulatory, Sunken Vessel Removal and National Emergency Preparedness ........................................ Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery Activities .................................... 'qA Chapter 26-1 27-1 28-1 29-1 30-1 31-1 32-1 33-1 34-1 35-1 35-1-A 36-1 37-1 38-1 39-1 40-1 41-1 42-1 43-1 44-1 45-1 46-1 47-1 48-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Chapter Appendices Flood Control Reservoirs Operable ....................................... A-1 Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps of Engineers but Operated by Others ..................................... A-26 Flood Control Projects Under Construction .................................. B-1 Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction .......................... B-16 Environmental Restoration Projects Under Construction ........................ B-19 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable ..................................... C-1 Navigation Project Under Construction .................................... D-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable .......................... E-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction .................. F-1 Flood Damages Suffered and Prevented .................................... G-1 Index I-1 ii OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, all embraced in the drainage basin of the Missouri River along the mainstem and tributaries to Rulo, NE. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 2. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, & ND 3. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Page 26-3 26-3 26-3 Flood Control 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD Bear Creek Lake, CO Bowman-Haley Lake, ND Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND Chatfield Lake, CO Cherry Creek Lake, CO Fall River Basin, SD Logan Creek, Pender, NE 12. Milk River, Malta, MT 13. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD 14. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA 15. Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA 16. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE 17. Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE 18. Perry Creek, IA 19. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha District) 20. Pipestem Lake, ND 21 Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE 22. South Platte River Basin, CO 23. Thurman to Hamburg, IA 24. Van Bibber Creek, CO 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 26. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 27. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization 26-3 26-4 26-4 26-4 26-4 26-5 26-5 26-5 26-6 26-6 26-6 26-6 26-7 26-7 26-7 26-8 26-8 26-8 26-8 26-9 26-9 26-9 26-9 26-9 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 28. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Under Special Authorization 29. Boyer Chute, NE 30. California Bend, NE 31. Deroin Bend, MO 32. Hidden Lake/Great Marsh, NE 33. Lower Decatur, NE 34. Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration 35. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 36. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 37. Fort Peck Lake, MT 38. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 39. Garrision Dam Major Rehabilitation, Lake Sakakawea, ND 40. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND 41. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD 42. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND 43. Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam, MT and Gavins Point Dam, SD & NE 26-1 Page 26-11 26-11 26-11 26-12 26-12 26-12 26-13 26-13 26-13 26-13 26-14 26-14 26-14 26-15 26-15 26-15 Miscellaneous 44. Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update 26-16 45. National Emergency Preparedness (NEPP) 26-16 46. Flood Control and Coastal Emergency (FC&CE) 26-16 47. General Regulatory Functions 26-17 48. General Investigations (See Table 26-K) 26-17 Tables 26-A Cost and Financial Statement 26-18 26-B Authorizing Legislation 26-25 26-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 26-30 26-D Not Applicable 26-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 26-31 26-F Other Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26-33 26-G Deauthorized Projects 26-34 26-H Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 26-36 26-I Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program 26-37 26-J Inspection of Completed Local Protection Projects 26-38 26-K Active General Investigations 26-42 26-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization 26-44 26-M Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 26-45 26-2 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous Projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in FY 1928, the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979, and the navigation feature was completed in September 1980. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Terminal Facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. A complete list of terminal facilities is included in the Missouri River navigation maps and can be obtained from the Omaha District for a small fee. Operations During FY. District personnel accomplished channel reconnaissance, surveys and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and layouts of construction, and supervision and administration. Local interests operate and maintain the recreation sites. Government Hired Labor Forces completed maintenance, which consisted of placing stone on damaged structures and placing structure markers to aid navigation. 2. MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, & MO Location. The project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to the mouth near St. Louis, Mo. Existing Project. To mitigate a portion of the fish and wildlife habitat losses resulting from the construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project. Estimated total cost of the project is $81,400,000 federal funds. Local Cooperation. This project has no cost-sharing sponsor. The entire project is being borne by the Federal government with no cost to either local governments or the affected states. Therefore, no Project Cooperation Agreement is required. Although the four affected states are not participating financially in the project, the states are very actively involved in the planning and design of the project. The states also are participating in the project by furnishing perpetual easements for construction and operation on existing state-owned lands. The states of Missouri and Iowa are the primary donors of such easements. Operations During FY. Efforts continued on acquiring land rights on 29,900 acres of land and agreements with the states for development on 18,200 acres of state-owned land. Construction contracts were awarded to create wildlife habitat. 3. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). No work during the period. Flood Control 4. ABERDEEN, SD Location. This project is in the Moccasin Creek subbasin in the city of Aberdeen, Brown County, South Dakota. Aberdeen is located in the James River Valley in the northeast quarter of South Dakota. 26-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Existing Project. The selected alternative is a 100- year event levee 2.9 miles long on the northeast side of Aberdeen that will prevent 49 percent of the average annual flood damages to structures and contents in that area. The proposed levee will essentially block existing drainage to Moccasin Creek, and a combination of culverts with gates and detention ponds were incorporated into the design to mitigate this interior drainage problem. A twofoot road raise at Fairgrounds Road is also included. Local Cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended applies. The city of Aberdeen and Brown County is paying the local share of the project. Operations During FY. Preparation of the plans and specifications were completed for Phase I and initiated for Phase II. The Phase I construction contract was awarded to construct a 1.4 mile long earthfill levee on the northeast side of Aberdeen. 5. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. The dam site is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO, about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing Project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,300 feet; and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake provides storage capacity of 28,831 acre-feet for flood control and 1,979 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 6. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. The dam site is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. Existing Project. An earth-fill dam 79 feet high, with a crest length of 5,730 feet, and a reservoir with a flood storage capacity of about 72,700 acre-feet, plus 19,780 acrefeet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 7. BUFORD TRENTON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ND (LAND ACQUISITION) Location. The Buford Trenton Irrigation District (BTID) is located in the flood plain along the left (north) bank of the Missouri River near its confluence with the Yellowstone River, in Williams County near Williston, ND. Existing Project. The project consists of the acquisition of permanent flowage and saturation easements within and surrounding the BTID for land that has been affected by rising ground water and the risk of surface flooding. There are approximately 70 affected landowners and 90 tracts. Approximately 10,000 acres are irrigable and 1,750 non-irrigable. Acquisition of easements and relocation assistance under P. L. 91-646 began in FY 1998. Estimated project cost is $40,129,000. Location Cooperation. The project is authorized under Section 336(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, P. L. 104-303. Local cooperation is not applicable. Operations During FY. This FY, seven easements were purchased totaling $2,421,119 with associated costs. Appraisal of existing tracts will continue into FY 2000 along with the purchase of additional easements. 8. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. A dam site on the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. 26-4 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Existing Project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet and a crest length of 12,500 feet; a reservoir with flood control capacity of 204,737 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 26,692 acrefeet, which will be used for recreation; and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. The Corps participated with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and was physically completed in 1992. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1993 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 9. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. A dam site on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO, just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver, Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and a crest length of 14,300 feet. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiple-purpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. Construction began in FY 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 10. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook, and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing Project. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during FY 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in FY 1953 with the exception of a road and parking area, which were completed in FY 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs Dam was completed in FY 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities, which were completed in FY 1972. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Local cooperation requirements have been fully complied with. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. 11. LOGAN CREEK, PENDER, NE Location. This project is located in northeastern NE, approximately 75 miles north-northwest of Omaha, NE. Pender is located along the right bank of Logan Creek, about midpoint in the Logan Creek basin. Existing Project. The selected plan is a combination levee and floodwall with a detention storage feature. It provides flood protection from Logan Creek as well as incidental benefit from Stage Creek flooding to the Village's residential and industrial area as well as its central business district. The levee extends approximately 15,000 feet in 26-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 length along the north, east, and south edge of the community, averaging 10 feet in height. Local Cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The Village of Pender is paying the local share of the project. Operations During FY. construction in FY 99. Continuation of 12. MILK RIVER, MALTA, MT Location. This project is located in Phillips County in North Central MT. The city of Malta is located approximately 170 miles northeast of Great Falls, MT. Existing Project. The selected plan is a levee/floodwall constructed along the right bank of the Milk River to provide protection for the area immediately upstream from the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) bridge. The project consists of an earthen levee that is 1,800 ft in length, combined with a floodwall that extends 1,040 ft. The height of the levee ranges from 4 to 10 ft above natural ground along its entire length. The levee/floodwall requires a tie-off with the existing BNSF grade on the downstream end. Local Cooperation. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The city of Malta participated in the projectfs costsharing requirements utilizing a $176,500 grant from the State of MT combined with real estate interests of approximately $282,000. Operations During FY. Construction phase is essentially complete with remaining requirements directed toward project management, coordination with local sponsors and project closeout. 13. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Location. On the Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing Project. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. The project provides erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, and at the same time preserves high bank flood plain lands. Estimated total cost of construction is $21,640,000 (1996) of which $21,000,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $640,000 is the non-Federal contributed funds. Local Cooperation. All recreational construction on this project will be done in accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. A cost-sharing contract with the state of South Dakota for the Myron Grove access site was signed on June 24, 1986; and the Yankton-Riverside Park Section 215 Agreement was signed on April 24, 1989. Construction was completed in June 1987 and June 1991, respectively. Operations During FY. Efforts to protect Federally listed threatened and endangered species and the drafting of a new General Management Plan (GMP) for this area were finalized and distributed. Construction contract for bank stabilization at Ponca State Park was awarded in August 1999. 14. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing Project. Construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. (See Table 26-A for total costs.) Operations During FY. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 15. NISHNABOTNA RIVER, HAMBURG, IA Location. This project, the Nishnabotna River and Main Ditch 6 at Hamburg, IA is located in Fremont County, 40 miles south-southeast of Omaha, NE. 26-6 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Existing Project. The selected plan determined in the feasibility investigations is the construction of a levee approximately 8,300 ft in length along the left bank of Main Ditch No. 6. A range of economically feasible plans were identified from which the city of Hamburg selected and is supported by the Corps. A levee will be constructed along Main Ditch 6 with a levee top, referenced as the 911.0 m.s.l. plan having an accedence equivalent to a 300- year event and a 46 percent reliability passing 500-year event. Selection of a levee height was constrained by the elevation of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad mainline tracks. The BNSF has raised its mainline track approximately 1.5 ft to accommodate the new levee. Local Cooperation. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The city of Hamburg is participating in the project's cost- sharing requirements utilizing a Community Development Block Grant to help fund real estate interests of approximately $130,500 and cash contributions of $226,800. Operations During FY. Completion of construction contract occurred with final inspection in September 1999. 16. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair and flows south-easterly through metropolitan Omaha. It is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creeks flow along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing Project. The project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs, channel improvements, an effluent storage facility, and a flood warning system on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction was initiated in FY 1972. Completed projects include Standing Bear Lake, Glenn Cunningham Lake, and Wehrspann Lake. Estimated total costs for the project is $68,659,000 consisting of $64,334,000 in Federal funds ($1,367,000 to be reimbursed by the non-Federal sponsor) and $2,958,000 non-Federal other costs and cash contributions. Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-6 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Construction was completed on recreation facilities at Ed Zorinsky Lake, and on the Big Papillion Creek Channel flood control project. The recreational facilities at Zorinsky Lake have been transferred to the City of Omaha for operations and maintenance. The Big Papillion Creek channel flood control project has been transferred to the Papio Natural Resource District for operation and maintenance. O&M manuals were being prepared in FY 99. 17. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Location. Scribner, NE, is located in Dodge County about 47 miles northwest of Omaha. Pebble Creek is a right-bank tributary to the Elkhorn River. Existing Project. The project includes a 3.6 mile-long levee along the Elkhorn River with a maximum height of 5 ft (a modification to the original Pebble Creek project), one closure structure at U.S. HWY 275 at the northern edge of Scribner, and several ramps over the two levees. An automated flood warning system was installed that will allow adequate time to operate the closure structure. Both levees are completed which essentially is one ring levee that provides protection for the entire city of Scribner. Local Cooperation. The city of Scribner strongly supported the entire Pebble Creek levee project, including the Elkhorn River levee and its modification. The City obtained cost-sharing assistance from the Nebraska Natural Resources Commission and the Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District. Operations During FY. Construction of the Elkhorn River levee was initiated in March 1994 with the original contract being completed in December 1995. A modification to the Elkhorn River levee was completed in July 1996. The total cost of the project was $3,232,000. The non- Federal portion of this totaled was $807,000 which includes $363,000 for lands, easements, and rights-of-way. Final audit and project closeout will occur in FY 2000. 18. PERRY CREEK, IA Location. The Perry Creek basin is located in Woodbury and Plymouth Counties in northwestern Iowa. The downstream five miles of the basin lie within the corporate limits of Sioux City, IA, and drain the central 26-7 I - __ - -- I -- - -I - - I - _ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 portion of the city. Existing Project. The project consists of 14,800 linear feet of grass and rock lined channel, 1,500 linear feet of new conduit, modification of 710 linear feet of existing conduit, and a concrete stilling basin, to provide capacity for the 100-year event. Also included are 4.25 miles of hiking/biking trail and a basin-wide flood warning system. Estimated project cost is $67,188,000, of which $42,580,000 is Federal cost and $24,608,000 is non- Federal cost. Local Cooperation. The project is authorized under the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The city of Sioux City, IA, is the local sponsor. Operations During FY. The Phase III construction contract is 50 percent complete and is scheduled to be 100 percent complete by October 2000. The Phase II construction contract was awarded in April 1999. Plans and specs for Phase IV were completed by December 1999. Relocation of the State of South Dakota's railroad bridge, which spans Perry Creek, is scheduled for completion in October 1999. 19. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing Project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on the Missouri River main stem and tributaries. See individual reports and Table 26-I for projects in the Omaha District included in the program. 20. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, three miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing Project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The multipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 21. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing Project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alternations. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of the Salt Creek survey report, additional units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were used to determine an effective method of correction for the dispersive clay problem in the completed downstream levees through Lincoln. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 22. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. 26-8 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Existing Project. General plan for flood control and other purposes to provide for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 26-B for authorizing legislation). 23. THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA Location. The project area is approximately 110 square miles. It extends from Thurman, IA, on the north to the mouth of the Nishnabotna River on the south and from the Missouri River on the west to the bluffs on the east. Existing Project. The flood problem was caused by floodwaters backing up behind the existing levees when drainage structures are closed during high flows on these rivers. Two pump stations have been built to alleviate this flooding in the southern half ofthe study area. The cost through construction was $1,040,760 Federal and $397,587 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. Fremont County, IA and five drainage districts were the cost-sharing sponsors. Operations During FY. The project was completed in April 1997. Final audit and project closeout were completed in FY 99. 24. VAN BIBBER CREEK, CO Location. Van Bibber Creek is a right bank tributary of Ralston Creek with the confluence in Arvada, CO. The potential project area includes approximately one mile of the downstream portion of the creek located partially in Arvada and partially in Jefferson County. Existing Project. The proposed project would include channel improvements including an underground conduit to convey Van Bibber Creek flood waters to Ralston Creek. Local Cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, applies. Operations During FY. Preparation of plans and specifications continued this FY. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the FY are set forth in Table 26-J, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. FY 1999 costs were $232,590. 26. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under Sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, the Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations involving storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1999 were $374,993; and total through September 30, 1999 were $9,413,890. 27. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Response Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disasters. Disasters - On June 2, 1999 the Fall River County Board of Commissioners and the City of Hot Springs, SD requested technical assistance from the Omaha District to route outlet releases from Cold Brook Dam through the county and city to the Fall River. Spring snowmelt run-off had increased discharge flows through the glory hole to 2 cfs in the channel. This along with the potential threat of heavy rainfall had the city and county seeking assistance in the resolution of their immediate concerns. The downstream channel capacity had been encroached upon by local area residences, and minimal flows would have caused considerable flooding throughout the area. The Corp provided a plan to city and county officials to provide additional culverts through the county roads, ditch the channel in the county and bury a 36-inch 26-9 -I --- I - I- L---- a i - - - - I - - I I- -~--L.-_ -- - _ _ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 culvert under the street through the city. The city and county successfully completed the work on June 17, 1999. On July 26, 1999 the Omaha District responded to the Governor of South Dakota's requests for assistance regarding a dangerous long term flooding situation for the community of Waubay, SD. Waubay is located in a closed basin region and rising lake levels were threatening the city's sanitary lift station #7. The district worked closely with State and Federal agencies to look at programs to protect the lift station. Various measures were considered including levees, raising roadways, relocations of both people and the lift station. It was decided that the Corp's Advance Measures program was the answer to the impending danger. An Advance Measures project was approved and funded. The project consists of constructing a concrete box structure around the lift station and a earthen berm to protect the lift station from rising lake levels and future ice related damages. Cost for the project is currently estimated at $30,000 and construction should be complete by November 23, 1999. Flood damages abounded from a 7 inch rainfall in the Omaha, NE, and Council Bluffs, IA, area on the evening and early morning of 6-7 August 1999. This storm raised havoc in a seven county area and in particular, residents of these two communities. A Presidential Disaster Declaration was signed and State and Federal agencies initiated the recovery efforts. The rainfall inundated numerous homes caused two deaths and damaged two Federally constructed projects. The Federal projects were the Missouri River Levee Unit L- 611-614 tieback levee near Council Bluffs, Iowa, and the Little Papillion Creek channel project in Omaha, Nebraska. Preliminary repair costs are currently estimated at $60,000 and $300,000 respectively. Repairs to both projects should be completed by December 31, 1999. Operational Program Areas. FY costs as follows: Preparedness: All Hazards Planning Activities ............. $ All Hazards Training & Exercise.............. Facilities........................... ....... National Centers of Expertise.................. 360,500 39,094 86,802 23,003 Emergency Operations: Response Operations............................... After Action Report .................. Post Flood Response........... .................. Acquisition of Supplies & Equipment ........ Support From Others.................................. Rehabilitation of Flood Control Works: Rehab. Federal Flood Control Works.......... Rehab. Non-Federal Flood Control Works.. Shore Protection.............................. ........ Field Investigations.................... ............ Inspections......................... ............ Interagency Levee Activities ....................... Advance Measures: Advance Measure Assistance ...................... Field Investigations ....................... ......... Hazard Mitigation (By State): Hazard Mitigation Team Activities............. 64,592 0 0 60,784 682,013 458,711 153,275 0 18,783 39,929 0 8,706 15,006 2 Emergency Work in Support of Other Federal Agencies. The Omaha District provided support to other divisions in response to three Presidential Disaster Declarations during 1999. The Pine Ridge Indian Reservation received a Presidential Disaster Declaration (PDA) in the aftermath of a tornado. Omaha District received a mission from FEMA to provide Technical Assistance to the reservation in the design and layout of a temporary housing site. Personnel were deployed to the site to meet with FEMA, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and Public Health Service officials. The Temporary Housing Team was also placed on alert in anticipation of this housing mission. After several weeks of negotiation, the mission was cancelled. The Temporary Housing Management Team deployed to San Antonio, TX, in support of the Southwestern Division in the aftermath of Hurricane Bret. However, FEMA did not task the Corps with a housing mission and the team returned home. In response to Hurricane Floyd, the district deployed a member of the Resource Management Functional Team to the North Atlantic Division. This individual provided financial support in the Emergency Operations Center. A member of the Logistics Emergency Response Team was also deployed in anticipation of Hurricane Floyd. This individual went to the South Atlantic Division where support was provided to logistical field operations. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control 26-10 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948 as amended.) Federal costs for FY 1999 were $203,454 for feasibility studies, $2,070,147 for plans and specifications and construction measures. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946 as amended.) Operations under this heading were as follows: Federal costs for FY 1999 were $0 for projects in the Planning and Design Analysis Phase and $262,613 for projects in the construction phase. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. Project Modifications For Improvement of Environment 28. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT These project modifications are accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as amended. Environmental modification efforts during FY 1999 were as follows: California Bend, NE, project cost (Feasibility Phase) $30,543; Hidden Lake, NE, project cost (completion of construction) $8,126; Lower Decatur, NE project cost (Feasibility Phase) $135,983; Boyer Chute, NE, project cost (Post-Construction Monitoring) $12,663; Deroin Bend, MO project cost (Plans and Specs) $32,764; Wehrspann Lake, NE project cost (Construction) $1,270,323. 29. BOYER CHUTE, NE Location. The side channel connecting river mile 633.5 to 637.7 on the Missouri River in Washington County, NE, about 7 miles north of Omaha, NE. Existing Project. The project was constructed from October 1992 to April 1993. Its purpose is to restore flows from the Missouri River into an old river channel, Boyer Chute. This has restored fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and will benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. The part of the old channel that was previously filled with sediment and grown up in young trees was cleared of vegetation, and a pilot channel for new inflows was excavated through it. Soil excavated from the pilot channel was placed along the channel to be washed away by restored chute flows over time. A 180-foot wide notch in the upstream riverbank was constructed for new inflows, and the chute's old outlet at the downstream end was widened. The culvert crossing of a road across the chute was replaced by a bridge, which passes adequate flows to prevent backwater effects and sedimentation. The total cost of about $4,019,000 was 25 percent costshared by a non- Federal sponsor. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District provided all needed cost-sharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $1,033,000 and cash of about $82,000. Operations During FY. A final project inspection was performed on May 3, 1995; and the project was turned over to the local sponsor. FY 1999 efforts included summarizing physical changes, in preparation for project closeout in FY 2000. 30. CALIFORNIA BEND, NE Location. The remnant river channel and floodplain land along river miles 648.5 - 650.0 along the Missouri River, in Washington County, about one mile east of Blair, NE. Existing Project. The project to be modified is the Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The California Bend modification will restore river flows through the historic river channel adjacent to the navigation channel, to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. The downstream end of a 1.5-mile long backwater will be enlarged to provide a permanent connection to the navigation channel, and about I mile of excavation will connect its upstream end to the river. This will create permanent flows through about 2.5 miles of channels. Some of the surrounding farmland will be restored to floodplain forest. Also several of the spur dikes along the navigation channel will be lowered to enable navigation flows to create shallow margins along the river. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District would 26-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 provide all needed cost-sharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $327,000, and cash of about $536,000. Operations During FY. Feasibility Studies were completed in FY 1999. 31. DEROIN BEND, MO Location. The floodplain land and watered areas riverward of Levee L-536, river mile 516.5 to 521.0 along the Missouri River, in Holt and Atchison Counties, about 2.5 miles west of Coming, MO. Existing Project. The project to be modified is the Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The Deroin Bend modification would restore a diversity of river flows along this reach of the Missouri River floodplain, to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. A flow-through chute would be excavated through the site along remnant channel alignments. This would create permanent flows through about 4 miles of channels. An existing 1 mile long scour lake would be connected to this chute, enabling river fish to access both the restored chute and the lake year-round. The surrounding lands would be restored to floodplain forest. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Missouri Department of Conservation would provide all needed cost-sharing, comprised entirely of real estate interests valued at approximately $750,000. The sponsor has already purchased all of the necessary tracts. Operations During FY. Plans and specs were completed this FY. Construction awaits successful execution of a Project Cooperation Agreement between the sponsor and the Corps. 32. HIDDEN LAKE/GREAT MARSH, NE Location. A historic backwater adjacent to Missouri River miles 602.5-603.5, and a nearby marsh, in Sarpy County, about I mile south of Omaha and adjacent to Bellevue, NE. Existing Project. The project being modified is the Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The Hidden Lake modification is restoring a historic backwater of the river to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. A one mile long backwater lake which was filled with sediment in a rare flood event has been excavated and reconnected at its downstream end to the river. The Great marsh modification has removed sediment and encroaching plants to deepen and expand a marshy wetland, extending its life and benefiting the aquatic community. About 40 acres of wetland were excavated at an average of two feet deeper, increasing the marsh also in size. Total project costs are $3,020,000, with a Federal share of $2,266,000. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District provided all needed cost sharing including real estate interests. Operations During FY. Construction was essentially complete and post-construction monitoring continued. 33. LOWER DECATUR, NE Location. The Missouri River's right (west) overbank including side channels, from river mile 684.5 to 689 on the Missouri River in Burt County, NE, about 2 miles southeast of Decatur, NE. Existing Project. Modification of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project (MRBSN) constructed from 1935 to 1982. Lower Decatur Bend is one of many bend cutoffs (straightenings) created by the Corps during channelization of the Missouri River for navigation and bank stabilization. The proposed project modification includes 3 main off-stream aquatic components: side-channel restoration, lowering of the riverward extent of closure spur dikes, and revetment lowering over an extended length to allow river flows to erode the river bank behind the revetment, thereby increasing the top width of the channel over an extended area. An opportunity exists at Lower Decatur Bend to restore the physical habitat to configurations more similar to those that existed prior to the channelization of this reach of the river. Total Project costs are estimated at $6,599,000, with a Federal share of $4,949,000. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District would provide all needed costsharing, including real 26-12 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT estate interests valued at approximately $574,000 and cash of about $1,076,000. Operation During FY. Feasibility studies were completed. 34. WEHRSPANN LAKE AQUATIC Location. The existing Papio Dam #20 and its Wehrspann Lake are located on a tributary to the South Branch Papillion Creek, West Branch Papillion Creek Basin, Sarpy County, NE, about 4 miles southwest of Omaha. The subimpoundment is located in the headwaters of Wehrspann Lake, within the lake's flood control pool, and within the existing project's boundaries. Existing Project. Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Improvement Project - Modification of Wehrspann Lake, completed in 1984 as Papio Dam #20 for flood control and recreation; Congressional District: NE-2. Wehrspann Lake site is located within Omaha, NE metropolitan area, and as such it is highly visible, heavily utilized and important ecological, recreational, and educational resource. The modification, a subimpoundment in the lake's flood control pool, will play an essential role in maintaining water quality and fish habitat within Wehrspann Lake by decreasing the amounts of influent nutrients and especially sediment. Total project costs are currently estimated at $2,660,000 with a Federal share of $1,995,000. Local Cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District is providing all needed cost sharing including real estate interests. Operations During FY. Project construction was initiated. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration 35. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Project restoration are accomplished under the authority of Section 206, Water Resource Development Act of 1996, (P. L. 104-303) as amended. Restoration efforts during FY 1999 consisted of one project, the first Section 206 project authorized for study nationwide; Nathan's Lake in NE. Federal cost for FY 1999 to continue Planning and Design Analysis Phase was $52,102. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 36. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On the Missouri River, 987.4 miles above the mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall reservoir (Lake Francis Case). Big Bend reservoir (Lake Sharpe) extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam 95 feet high, with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of five 58,500 kilowatt units, three 67,276 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,859,000 acre-feet. Federal cost of the project was $107,498,000. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operation During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. During the period, 1,107,278,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity were produced. 37. FORT PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT Location. The reservoir is in the Missouri River Valley in McCone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.6 miles above the mouth of the Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest; and Nashua, nine miles north. Existing Project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 21,026 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,688,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started on the original project in 26-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 October 1933 and on the second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The five generators have a total output of 185,250 KW: two generators at 40,000 KW each, two generators at 43,500 KW each and one generator at 18,250 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Federal cost of the project was $158,428,000, Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 1,082,740,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 38. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. Located on the Missouri River in Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above the mouth of the Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 165 feet; a crest length of 10,700 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,494,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $199,066,000. Non-Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing and bridge approaches. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 2,205,324,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 39. GARRISON DAM MAJOR REHABILITATION, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND Location. Located on the Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND, 1,389.9 miles about the mouth and 75 miles above Bismarck. Existing Project. Garrison Dam is a multi-purpose project consisting of a rolled earth-filled dam with a sheet pile cutoff, a hydroelectric power plant, and a reservoir with storage capacity of 23,821,000 acre feet for flood control, navigation, power, recreation, irrigation, and municipal water supply. This major rehabilitation project will replace the turbine runners on all five existing units with new runners designed to improve reliability and maximize efficiency over a broad range of operating conditions for a total project cost of $37,122,000. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations During FY. Continued design and initiated construction resulting in five new contract awards for turbine runner replacement (with options to rewind two generators), recondition governors, provide new set bulkheads and recondition cranes. 40. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. Located on the Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,389.9 miles above the mouth and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,821,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units (three units rated at 109,250 kilowatts each and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each), three flood control tunnels, and a gated spillway. Federal cost of the project was $299,938,000, including $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except 26-14 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT for recreational development using Code 710 funds. Local Cooperation. None required except costsharing with the state of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment and recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 2,617,705,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 41. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On the Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about four miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above the mouth. Existing Project. A concrete and rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 492,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 44,099 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $49,617,000.Construction of the original project was initiated in March 1952 and completed in 1964. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 859,996,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity during FY. 42. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on the Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about six miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above the mouth. Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 245 feet; a crest length of 9,300 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,137,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 112,290 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $346,521,000. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and the project was placed in operation in June 1963. Local Cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations During FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 3,144,275,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 43. MISSOURI RIVER, BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM, MT AND GAVINS POINT DAM, SD, NE Location. The project is located along the Missouri River between Fort Peck Dam, MT, and a point 59 miles downstream of Gavins Point Dam, SD and NE. Existing Project. Consists of undertaking measures, including maintenance and rehabilitation of existing structures, to alleviate bank erosion and related problems associated with releases from the six Missouri River main stem dams that the Secretary determines will be needed. In lieu of structural measures, lands may be acquired in affected areas from willing sellers. The costs of the measures shall be apportioned among project purposes as a joint-use operation and maintenance expense. Estimated Federal cost of the project is between $112 million for construction or $12 million for the land requisition alternative. Cost is limited to no more than $3 million per FY. Local Cooperation. Non-federal funds are not required for this project. One reach, the Missouri National Recreational River downstream from Gavins Point Dam, requires, under its separate authorization, that the landowners make available appropriate land interests to maintain the recreational and scenic qualities of the river and adjacent lands. In the other river reaches, lands can be 26-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 acquired on a willing-seller basis if land acquisition is the recommended measure for erosion control at a given river site. Operations During FY. Continued coordination for sloughing easements in pursuit of real estate acquisitions in response to requests from landowners. Monitored previously constructed Section 33 projects. Completed constniction for the Conventional Erosion Control at Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND. Began cumulative impacts study to determine effects of bank erosion. Miscellaneous 44. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE Location. The area being studied is the Missouri River basin, to include the Missouri River main stem system. States included in the study area include Nebraska, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri. Existing Project. During 1987 through 1992, the Missouri River basin experienced a moderate to severe drought, impacting upon the Missouri River main stem projects for the first time since filled in 1967. The drought has had severe impacts on people and industries who use the Missouri River and the main stem reservoirs for navigation, hydropower, water supply, and recreation. Some of the people impacted by the drought have stated that the current Master Water Control Manual for the Missouri River main stem system of reservoirs does not adequately take into consideration the contemporary needs of the basin. The purpose of the Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update study is to determine the water control plan that best meets the needs of the Missouri River basin. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations/Activities During FY. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was released for public review in September 1994. A public comment period was initiated with the release of the DEIS and completed March 1, 1995. During the public comment period, 24 public hearings were held throughout the Missouri and Mississippi River Basins. In order to respond to the numerous comments received on the DEIS, additional or revised technical analyses were necessary in the following areas; interior drainage and groundwater impacts landward of levees, cumulative impacts of bank stabilization, daily flow model, flood control, regional economics, Missouri and Mississippi River navigation, and Missouri River native river fish. During FY 1998, the results of these additional or revised analyses were documented and alternative reevaluation completed. A Preliminary Revised DEIS (PRDEIS), published in August 1998, identified eight alternatives representing the full range of Basin interests. A tribal and public coordination period, which extended until January 30, 1999 followed. A Revised Draft EIS (RDEIS) is scheduled to be published in October 1999. The PRDEIS will present a preferred alternative and will be the subject of full public review and comment, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act. A Final EIS (FEIS) is scheduled for completion in December 2000. Following release of the FEIS, a Washington level review will be conducted and a Record of Decision (ROD) signed. No substantial change in the operation of the mainstem reservoir system will be implemented until the ROD is signed and the Master Manual is revised. 45. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) AND SUPPORT FOR FEMA P. L. 93-288 (and Antecedent Legislation) Continuity of Operations (510) National Preparedness Planning (520) Emergency Operations Center Support (530) Total Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program $ 20,484 69,330 3,012 $ 90,826 46. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC&CE) Flood control work under Authorization Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting. P. L. 84-99. Disaster Preparedness (100) Emergency Operations (200) Rehabilitation and Inspection Program (300) Advance Measures (400) Hazard Mitigation (600) Reimbursable Activities (900) Total FC&CE $ 509,399 125,376 670,698 23,712 2 682,013 $ 2,011,200 26-16 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT 47. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluation Enforcement Studies Environmental Impact Statement Reimbursable Activities Total Regulatory $ 3,521,423 283,828 64,256 65,567 23,147 $ 3,958,221 48. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS FY 1999 nonreimbursable costs totaled $1,643,269 for all General Investigation activities. See Table 26-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Research and Development, Preconstruction Engineering and Design (projects not fully authorized), Planning and Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and Preconstruction Engineering and Design (fully authorized projects). 26-17 - I I I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Sioux City, IA to Rulo NE) 2. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, MO 4. Aberdeen & Vicinity, SD Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 5. Bear Creek Lake, CO 6. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 7. Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND (Land Acquisition) New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. - 189,225,991 1/ --- 189,225,991 1/ 1,671,000 1,802,000 2,143,000 1,685,956 1,803,264 2,114,434 2,779,000 1,584,000 1,374,000 3,905,783 1,208,461 1,603,873 130,957 200,988 130,957 200,988 394,000 334,567 205,000 201,345 187,000 128,231 187,000 128,231 345,700 352,123 164,000 161,906 54,000 101,637 2,034,000 2,081 57 4,070,000 3,374,515 352,802 327,226 30,084 4,539 54,000 382,886 101,637 331,765 360,000 416,000 364,699 417,667 155,000 130,000 159,626 131,588 2,300,000 2327,000 2,071,907 2,421,119 127,582,450 127,581,934 22,283,000 21,333,536 834,759 791,039 30,084 4,539 864,843 797,578 62,018,608 62,018,608 5,714,309 5,713,613 4,372,174 4,372,174 4,014,270 4,013,753 4,627,000 4,493,026 1/ Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery Act funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and $1,181,125 for previous project. 26-18 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 1999 8. Chatfield Lake, CO (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 9. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 10. Fall River Basin, SD (Cottonwood & Coldbrook) 11. Logan Creek Pender, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 12. Milk River, Malta, MT Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work:, Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. 929,000 1,019,185 525,000 504,082 424,000 402,063 42,713 144,220 11,654 142,713 155,874 574,500 571,354 85,900 53,502 660,400 624,856 773,000 955,000 791,429 954,737 771,000 781,224 324,000 344,833 1,237,000 1,212,239 490,000 474,854 229,200 2,422,000 222,084 2,392,477 ---- 264,790 ----- 63,895 229,200 2,686,790 222,084 2,456,372 604,268 555,205 61,700 76,486 665,965 631,691 -39,200 17,495 938 -39,200 18,433 783,000 794,914 95,444,010 95,444,010 1,315,328 1,315,328 96,759,338 96,759,338 13,980,230 13,979,966 15,220,364 15,220,364 1,326,000 14,917,474 1,358,725 14,912,065 337,000 350,767 1,083,100 1,038,621 0 131,543 1,083,100 1,170,164 0 6,816 0 0 0 6,816 5,538,432 5,538,432 7,970,201 7,964,602 4,148,113 4,053,569 394,090 324,736 4,542,203 4,378,305 1,483,618 1,470,507 222,720 205,937 1,706,338 1,676,444 26-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 13. Missouri National Recreational River NE& SD 14. Missouri River Kenslers Bend, NE, to Sioux City, IA 15. Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 16. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 17. Pebble Creek Scribner, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funding New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. FY 96 38,459 45,887 192,000 406,340 FY 97 105,000 110,890 196,000 174,245 FY 98 150,000 117,322 196,000 229,911 FY 99 Total Cost to September 30, 1999 416,000 2,665,259 235,697 2,443,885 65,000 2,694,000 167,384 2,688,150 11,294,414 11,294,414 59,000 57,772 83,000 19,117 33,450 23,130 116,450 42,247 325,073 37,614 362,687 571,000 586,413 -65,000 116,079 ------- 39,277 -65,000 155,356 88,000 88,349 151,900 188,774 4,600 17,413 156,500 206,187 18,070 5,857 23,927 615,000 605,775 3,221 59,000 57,132 587,500 281,129 55,890 11,733 643,390 292,862 1,091 38,000 5,021,419 41,152 5,021,289 266,500 1,318,600 606,611 1,312,422 170,947 183,621 359,887 326,246 437,447 1,678,487 790,232 1,638,668 0 66,612,215 / 6,453 66,603,566 2/ 955,000 884,680 1,091 593,000 581,127 0 6,453 532,000 552,855 0 547 0 444 0 3,665 67,567,215 67,488,246 9,666,444 9,664,420 2,725,728 2,716,696 435,656 419,880 0 3,161,384 547 3,136,576 2/ Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. 26-20 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (nntinued) COST AND NANCIATL TATF'MFiNT See Section in Text Project 18. Perry Creek, IA (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 20. Pipestem Lake, ND 21. Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE 23. Thurman to Hamburg, IA Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 24. Van Bibber Creek, CO Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funding New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 1,354,000 4,650,000 3,424,000 5,524,584 4,850,900 2,516,925 ---- - 400,000 - ---- 86,625 1,354,000 4,650,000 3,824,000 5,524,584 4,850,900 2,603,550 494,000 491,921 674,000 679,123 449,612 137,471 0 137,471 449,612 213,889 217,319 619,000 561,000 617,114 539,598 778,000 757,000 772,287 750,354 360,000 399,998 157,000 294,218 517,000 694,216 6,000 26,028 26,028 6,000 355,000 216,000 261,285 252,741 1,030 213,889 217,319 355,000 261,285 216,000 253,771 3/ Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that portion of the project which is currently being carried in a deferred status. 26-21 FY 99 6,235,237 6,799,322 850,000 1,023,819 7,085,237 7,823,141 580,000 608,744 728,000 741,767 (30,237) (26,281) 0 26,281 (30,237) 0 50,200 77,715 0 0 50,200 77,515 Total Cost to September 30, 1999 21,531,485 21,099,711 1,250,000 1,110,444 22,781,485 22,210,155 9,277,545 9,277,545 8,239,404 8,239,085 12,197,621 3/ 12,197,621 3/ 15,939,276 15,938,107 1,040,763 1,040,763 397,587 397,587 1,438,350 1,438,350 1,073,789 1,037,515 125,200 125,200 1,198,989 1,162,715 acaI ia AII rLa 1 \ Y I v vu r �,y r ' r r 'r i AJ_ y r A ~ VA JL~ A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 26-A (continued) See Section in Text Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 25. Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects 26. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 29. Boyer Chute, NE (Mo Riv Bank.. Stab/Nav) Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 30. California Bend, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 31. Deroin Bend, MO (Mo Riv Levee Unit L536) Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funds 32. Hidden Lake/ Great Marsh, NE Required Contributed Consolidated Summary Maint. Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. 188,000 253,000 238,000 188,151 251,864 231,759 377,000 470,000 334,000 375,283 473,101 374,993 10,000 64,388 2,453 10,000 37,948 165,000 156,120 165,000 156,120 2,898 20,000 9,806 6 ------ 2,904 20,000 9,806 16,000 137,000 24,499 136,570 16,000 137,000 24,499 136,570 115,000 140,000 135,000 110,419 107,215 166,357 115,000 140,000 135,000 110,419 107,215 166,357 1,550,000 359,000 1,550,425 377,295 548,000 102,000 427,837 137,075 2,098,000 461,000 1,978,262 514,370 200 61,843 62,043 26-22 FY 99 Total Cost to September 30, 1999 224,000 232,590 372,000 374,993 20,000 12,663 5,457,476 5,456,832 9,416,684 9,413,890 1,779,500 1,760,516 82,000 81,993 1,861,500 1,842,509 445,500 439,217 445,500 439,217 494,500 490,105 494,500 490,105 2,221,000 2,213,265 650,000 642,549 2,871,000 2,855,814 20,000 12,663 35,000 30,543 35,000 30,543 25,000 32,765 25,000 32,765 15,000 8,126 0 15,794 15,000 23,920 /a-t- e V - \-,-V--------/ V ~ - \Y -, - \L f \ - i -c, -- - -- -, - OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (continued) See Section in Text Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 96 FY 97 33. Lower Decatur, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funds 34. Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funds 36. Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 37. Fort Peck Lake, MT 38. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. 2,500 1,311 2,500 1,311 65,000 44,784 65,000 44,784 263,000 166,005 268,000 166,005 110,000 123,269 110,000 123,269 307,000 351,728 307,000 351,728 171,000 158,912 171,000 158,912 5,527,000 5,692,300 7,121,300 5,504,991 5,595,713 6,623,326 100,000 675,000 135,983 657,489 100,000 675,000 135,983 657,489 1,328,000 1,674,000 1,270,323 1,597,288 506,000 506,000 303,376 303,376 1,834,000 2,180,000 1,573,699 1,900,664 107,497,597 107,497,597 6,035,000 115,635,573 4/ 6,667,015 115,624,555 4/ 158,428,080 158,428,080 4,481,000 3,459,000 4,141,000 3,859,970 3,469,804 4,891,338 4,391,000 100,669,834 4/ 4,505,403 100,614,516 4/ 199,065,883 199,065,883 9,122,000 8,943,500 9,118,000 8,951,889 9,149,872 8,887,964 7,844,000 179,071,134 4/ 8,147,631 179,060,584 4/ 4/ Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 26-23 FY 98 FY 99 Total Cost to September 30, 1999 __, REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Project Garrison Dam Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 96 FY 97 New Work: Approp. Cost. Federal Funds Maint Approp. Cost. 8,141,000 8,491,000 7,540,000 8,111,952 8,113,054 7,942,739 9,050,000 193,329,673 4/ 9,165,548 193,325,741 4/ 374,000 1,035,000 356,271 555,288 41. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD 42. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD & ND 43. Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam MT & Gavins Point Dam, SD and NE 44. Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update 4/ Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. 49,617,239 49,617,239 6,244,000 5,933,500 6,227,000 6,170,067 5,931,717 5,965,884 6,984,000 131,875,412 4/ 7,336,181 131,840,026 4/ 346,520,603 346,520,603 8,723,000 9,148,000 11,669,200 8,737,237 9,246,349 10,292,662 366,000 1,568,739 735,000 737,000 242,223 1,528,412 3,094,000 2,549,000 1,800,000 3,351,586 2,566,603 1,810,941 10,685,000 198,635,700 4/ 12,081,727 198,592,834 4/ 2,183,000 2,385,152 1,863,000 1,814,557 6,655,000 6,596,114 23,310,000 23,261,557 26-24 TABLE 26-A (continued) See Section in Text 40. FY 98 FY 99 Total Cost to September 30, 1999 295,729,613 295,729,613 Major Rehab: Approp. Cost. Required Contributed Funds Approp. Cost. 4,500,000 4,424,506 10,117,310 9,544,375 686,961 686,961 ___._ L._._ ._ _- r OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6 foot depth from Quindaro Bend (Kansas City, MO to Sioux City, IA). Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. For completion of project from mouth to Sioux City, IA. For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong. PL 71-520 PL 73-67 H. Doc 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong. PL 79-14 2. Water Resources Development Act Of 1986 Flood Control Act of 1948 MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, MO Mitigate fish and wildlife losses resulting from the con- Section 601, struction and operation of the Missouri River Bank PL 99-662 Stabilization and Navigation project. ABERDEEN & VICINITY, SD Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction Aug 13, 1968 Flood Control Act of 1962 Section 336(a) Water Resources Development Act of 1996 Flood control Act of 1950 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO A flood control reservoir for protection of metropolitan Denver, CO. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Flood Control reservoir and water supply. S. Doc. 87, 90th Cong. PL 90-483 H. Doc. 574, 87th Cong. PL 87-874 BUFORD TRENTON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ND (LAND ACQUISTION) CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Flood control reservoir and channel improvements to provide downstream protection for Denver, CO. Modified 1950 Flood Control Act to operate dam and other Federal improvements to achieve authorized level of protection, beginning at dam and ending 82 miles downstream. Reassigns a portion of the storage space in the lake project to joint flood control-conservation purposes. Modified 1974 WRDA to exempt prohibition of encroachment for Mineral Ave/ Ken Caryl Rd. ext & transmission line. P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 26-25 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH Jan 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 6. 7. 8. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Aug.18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 Aug 18, 1941 Flood Control Act of 1948 Flood Control Act of 1948 National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 Flood Control Act of 1948 Flood Control Act of 1968 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 June 30, 1948 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Provide flood control to the town of Hot Springs, SD. LOGAN CREEK, PENDER, NE Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction MILK RIVER, MALTA, MT Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri River between the reaches from Gavins Point Dam, NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Construction of dike, revetments. H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doe. 655, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 95-625 H. Doe. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 80-858 NISHNABOTNA RIVER, HAMBURG, IA Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Series of flood control reservoirs, providing protection for the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. Authorized additional $4.8 million for channel improvement on Big Papillon Creek, and to Union Pacific RR bridge, rec trail and flood warning system. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. PERRY CREEK, IA Provide flood protection for Perry Creek, Iowa. H. Doe. 349, 90th Cong. PL 90-485 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 858, 80th Cong. Section 401, PL 99-662 26-26 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 31, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Flood Control Act of 27 Oct 1965 19. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Provide flood control for Jamestown, ND and downstream areas. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000. Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of general comprehehsive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam. Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Changed comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Oahe Dam and Reservoir, ND. Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. 26-27 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1,75th Cong. PL 75-761 H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 475, and S. D6cs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 PL 79-526 PL 81-516 H. Does. 549 and 642, 81st Cong. PL 83-780 PL 83-776 PL 84-505 H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. P. L. 85-500 P.L 86-645 P. L. 88-253 P.L. 89-042 P. L. 90-483 H. Doe. 91-748 and S. Doec. 91-895 P.L. 91-282 S. Doe. 91-1100, 91st Cong. P.L. 91-576 H. Doec. 91-23 and P.L. 91-611 P.L. 92-222 P.L. 93-251 P. L. 94-347 P.L. 95-189 H. Doe. 266, 89th Cong. P.L. 89-298 20. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 Jul 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Flood Control Act of 1948 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Dec. 22, 1944 SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Series of dams and channel improvements for flood control around Lincoln, NE. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA Install pumping facilities to prevent flooding in the Thurman to Hamburg area of the Missouri River in western Fremont County, IA. H. Doc. 396, 84th Cong. P.L. 85-500 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. P.L. 81-516 P.L. 90-17 P. L. 90-843 P.L. 91-282 P.L. 92-222 P.L. 93-251 P. L. 94-34'; P.L. 95-189 Section 1152 P. L. 99-662 VAN BIBBER CREEK, CO Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction BOYER CHUTE, NE Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement CALIFORNIA BEND, NE Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement DEROIN BEND, MO Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement HIDDEN LAKE/GREAT MARSH Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement LOWER DECATUR, NE Section 1135(b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986 as amended; environmental improvement WEHRSPANN LAKE AQUATIC, NE Section 1135(b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986 as amended; environmental improvement BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 26-28 21. 22. 23. 24. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 36. OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 37. June 16, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 May 18, 1938 38. Dec 22, 1944 40. Dec. 22, 1944 PWA 1968 Dec. 22, 1944 41. 42. Dec. 22, 1944 43. Water Resources Development Act of 1988 44. Dec 22, 1944 FORT PECK LAKE, MT Construction of earth dam, as recommended by Chief of Engineers Sep 30, 1933, was approved by Executive Order by the President and included in Public Works Administration program, Oct 14, 1933 as authorized by the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 and adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 (PL 74-409). Completion, maintenance, and operation of a hydroelectric power plant, subject to certain provisions in act respecting transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes installation of additional power-generating facilities by Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of Bureau of Reclamation. FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. OAHE DAM- LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD & ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. MISSOURI RIVER BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM ,MT & GAVINS POINT DAM, SD & NE Undertake measures to alleviate bank erosion and related problems associated with releases along the Missouri River from the six main stem dams. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong. P .L. 74-409 P. L. 75-529 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. P .L. 78-534 H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475 and S. Doe. 247, 78th Cong. P. L. 78-534 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. Section 33, PL 100-676 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. P. L. 78-534 26-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 199, TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projec Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582 88,716 26-30 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD 1/ Complete 1940 37,410 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA Complete 1982 7,458,934 Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE 2/ Complete 1970 262,479 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE 21 Complete 1974 293,016 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND 2/ Complete 1960 102,980 Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 City ofAurora, Westerly Creek, CO Complete 1955 150,000 Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Complete 1967 191,282 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Complete 1939 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Complete 1954 2,557,680 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD 2/ Complete 1981 3,000,000 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Complete 1964 400,000 East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA 2/ Complete 1986 2,154,016 Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 11,556,667 Forsyth, MT Complete 1950 255,177 Frazer-Wolf Point, MT Complete 1982 435,000 Gering Valley, NE Complete 1971 5,989,663 Glasgow, MT Complete 1939 16,832 Great Falls, MT Complete 1991 11,905,000 Greybull, WY Complete 1960 248,507 Havre, MT Complete 1958 1,825,881 Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Complete 1954 50,216 Hooper, NE 2/ Complete 1968 326,667 Ida Grove, IA 2/ Complete 1972 522,344 Indian Creek at Emerson, IA 2/ Complete 1986 333,000 Jamestown Reservoir, ND Complete 1950 Linton, ND 2/ Inactive 1973 Little Papillion Creek, NE Complete 1976 3,643,111 Little Sioux River, IA Complete 1992 20,630,000 Loup River, Columbus, NE 2/ Complete 1973 1,000,000 Lower Heart River, ND Complete 1964 1,961,173 Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND 2/ Complete 1991 1,153,430 Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks 2/ Complete 1967 234,839 Mandan, Heart River, ND Complete 1960 676,916 Marmarth, ND Complete 1960 169,498 McCook Lake, SD Complete 1958 147,627 Miles City, MT Inactive 1956 Missouri River, Aten, NE Complete 1951 578,791 1/ Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 26-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 26-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO Complete 1993 37,964,177 Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Complete 1945 99,370 Mott, ND Deferred - - - Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE 2/ Complete 1976 1,000,000 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA Complete 1948 236,000 Norfolk, NE Complete 1971 3,400,504 Omaha, NE Complete 1954 5,903,640 Pierce, NE Complete 1967 296,597 Platte River Near Schuyler, NE 2/ Complete 1948 74,940 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE Complete 1971 257,398 Platte River and Tributaries, NE Inactive - 1,538,269 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD Complete 1980 1,004,000 Saco, MT Complete 1958 67,793 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD Complete 1978 184,380 Sheridan, WY 3/ Complete 1976 2,618,809 Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MT 2/ Complete 1951 25,747 - Sioux Falls, SD Complete 1966 5,288,707 Vaughn, MT, Sun River 2/ Complete 1971 457,582 Waterloo, NE Complete 1970 237,883 West Point, NE Complete 1966 149,596 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT Complete 1960 230,294 2/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3/ Includes Inactive segment. 26-32 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-F OTHER MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Gavins Point Dam - Lewis and Clark Lake, Relocation of Niobrara, NE Complete 1980 13,516,459 Williston, ND Water Intake Complete 1981 988,583 26-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds Project Report For Document Expended Expended Billings, MT (Western Unit) Boulder, CO Buffalo, Johnson County Diversion Channel, WY Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO Davids Creek Lake, IA Dayton, WY Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE Indian Creek Lake, IA Lake Herman (Dredging), SD Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE Milk River, Havre, MT Miles City, MT Morrison, Bear Creek, CO Oahe Dam - Lake Oahe (Wildlife Restoration), ND Redwater River and Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD 1976 1976 1961 1943 1972 1956 1952 1969 N/A 1973 N/A 1982 1950 N/A 1966 Sec. 201, FC Act 1950 23 Mar 81 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 PL 77-228 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct86 Sec. 203, PL 90-483 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 6 Nov 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 204, PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act of 1950 Section 1001(b) WRDA 1986 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 FC Act of 1970 Section 1001(b) WRDA 1986 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 26-34 75,000 142,666 135,000 282,200 30,000 0 1,000 The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthorized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86; Aowa & South Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND; James River, ND & SD;,Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE; South Dakota Lakes, SD; Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT; South Platte River, Denver-Ft. Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; Lower Big Sioux River IA & SD; Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Missouri River Basin, ND; Sheridan, WY (Stage III); Missouri River Levee System Units: R531, R540, R553, R555, R577, R589, R603, R610, R623, R644, R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703, R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750. OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-G (continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds Project Report For Document Expended Expended Shell Creek, NE 1962 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 71,000 WRDA of 1974 3 Oct 78 Upper Missouri River, SD N/A Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 Streambank Erosion Control Project WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Vermillion River and Tribs, SD 1968 Sec. 12 PL 93-251 208,000 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthorized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86; Aowa & South Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND; James River, ND & SD;,Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE; South Dakota Lakes, SD; Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT; South Platte River, Denver-Ft. Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; Lower Big Sioux River IA & SD; Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Missouri River Basin, ND; Sheridan, WY (Stage III); Missouri River Levee System Units: R531, R540, R553, R555, R577, R589, R603, R610, R623, R644, R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703, R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750. 26-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TABLE 26-H Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 L601 L594 R580 L575 R573 R562 L561-550 R548 L536 R520 R613 R616 L611-614 L627, L624, L561-550 Comprehensive Mosquito Creek Levee Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees Pleasant Valley Levee Nebraska City Levee Thurman-Hamburg Levee Otto County Drainage District No. 2 Peru Dike Atchison County Levee District No. 1 Brownville-Nemaha Levee Mill Creek Levee Richardson County Drainage District No. 8 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees Remedial Studies on Completed Units Restudy of Levee System 14.2 15.0 11.4 0.2 45.8 5.9 7.6 41.3 19.5 13.6 6.3 14.0 4.5 22.0 Complete 1950 Complete 1966 Complete 1964 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1952 Complete 1952 Complete 1952 Complete 1960 Complete 1971 Complete 1987 Complete 1988 Studies Complete Studies Complete 26-36 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM TABLE 26-I (See Section 19 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Fort Peck Lake, MT 1/, 2/ 158,428,000 1,103,000 Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND 1, 2/3/ 305,274,065 1,516,000 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE) 1/ 37,931,000 4,618,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, SD and ND 1, 2/ 346,521,000 2,320,000 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD 1/,1/ 107,498,000 302,000 Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD 1/, 2/ 199,066,000 1,609,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE 1, 2/ 49,617,000 137,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE 2/ 13,516,000 Omaha, NE 2/ 5,904,000 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA 2/1 2,558,000 146,000 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND 2/ 9,413,000 270,000 Cherry Creek Lake, CO 1/, 2/ 15,220,000 285,000 1/ Details presented on Individual report. 2/ Completed. 3/ Active portion of project. 26-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 264 (See Section 25 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Beaver Creek, Saco Sep 99 * Clyde Park, Shields River Aug 92 Glasgow, Milk River Sep 97 Havre, Milk River Sep 98 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Sep 98 Three Forks, Lower Madison River Sep 92 Forsythe, Yellowstone River Sep 99 West Glendive, Yellowstone River Sep 99 Sun River,Vaughn Sep 98 * Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston Oct 96 Sun River, Great Falls Sep 98 * Milk River, Malta (Sewer Line) May 96 * Yellowstone River, Livingston (N.E. Livingston Bridge) Sep 99 * Milk River, Chinook (Finley Bridge) Oct 96 * Battle Creek, Chinook (Uhruh Bridge) May 99 * East Gallatin, Near Bozeman (Intst Bridge) Sep 99 * Yellowstone River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89 -7 Miles East of Livingston) Sep 99 * Shields River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89) Sep 99 * Teton River, Near Choteau (Hwy 89) Sep 98 * Madison River, Quake Lake Sep 99 * Milk River, Malta May 94 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization Project, Frazer Sep 94 * Dearborn River - Hwy 287, Wolf Creek Sep 98 * Muddy Creek - Int Hwy 15 - Frontage Road, Vaughn Sep 98 * Badger Creek - Hwy 89, Browning Sep 98 Wyoming * Baldwin Creek, Lander (Sewage Lagoons) Sep 99 Greybull, Big Horn River Sep 99 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks Sep 99 * Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell Aug 92 * Shoshone River, Byron Oct 98 * Powder River, Arvada Oct 98 * Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain Jan 97 North Dakota Mandan, Lower Heart River Oct 96 Marmarth, Little Missouri River May 99 Scranton, Buffalo May 99 * Cannonball River Oct 97 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-38 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 25 of Text) Location Month Inspected South Dakota Big Sioux River, Union County Jul 99 Big Sioux River, North Sioux City Jul 99 Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Jul 99 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River Aug 99 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Sep 99 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Sep 99 Herreid, Spring Creek Sep 95 * Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Sep 93 * Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre * Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 99 * Rapid Creek, Rapid City Sep 99 * Missouri River, Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton Aug 97 * Vermillion River, Vermillion Jun 99 * Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh Jun 99 * Big Sioux River, Jefferson Aug 98 Deadman Gulch, Sturgis Aug 99 * Marne Creek, Yankton Jun 99 * White River, Winner Oct 96 * James River, Yankton Jun 99 * Missouri River, White Swan & Sunshine Bottoms Aug 98 * Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Jun 99 Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam May 99 * South Platte River, Kersey Aug 99 * South Platte River, Merino Sep 99 * South Platte River, Iliff Sep 99 * South Platte River, Platteville Sep 99 * Big Thompson River, Johnstown Aug 99 * Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant) Sep 96 * South Platte River, Fort Lupton Hwy 85 Aug 99 * South Platte River, Logan County (Bridges 175A & 173) Sep 99 * Downstream Chatfield, Denver Jun 99 Nebraska * Blackbird Creek, Burt County May 97 Omaha, Missouri River Sep 97 Waterloo, Elkhomrn River May 99 West Point, Elkhorn River May 99 Pierce, Elkhorn River May 99 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Jun 99 Hooper, Elkhorn River Jul 99 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhomrn River May 99 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks May 99 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Sep 99 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Aug 96 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 264 (Continued) (See Section 25 of Text) Location Month Inspected Nebraska (continued) Macy, Blackbird Creek May 99 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Mar 99 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek May 99 Columbus, Loup River Aug 99 'Broken Bow, Mud Creek Aug 99 * Platte River, Brady Feb 95 * Elm Creek, Decatur Nov 98 * Nebraska City South Table Creek Jul 99 * Wigle Creek, Homer Dec 98 * South Elkhorn River, near Ewing, NE May 99 * Elk Creek, Jackson Dec 98 * Elk Creek, Willis Dec 98 Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus Aug 99 * Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder Nov 98 * Elm Creek, Burt County Apr 98 * Platte River, Camp Ashland Nov 98 * West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE Dec 98 * Logan Creek, Near Bancroft Dec 98 * Platte River, Near North Bend Aug 98 * Elkhorn River, Near Beemer Nov 98 * East Bow Creek, Wynot Jun 99 * Cedar River, Spalding Aug 97 ** Ames Diking District near Ames Aug 98 ** North Bend Diking District Aug 98 ** Cottrelle Diking District Jul 99 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Winslow Levee Jul 99 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Bowman, Zach, Roth Jul 99 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Peterson Jul 99 ** Clear Creek Diking District Jul 99 ** SID # 1 Lake Waconda Jul 99 ** SID #97 Hawaiian Village Jul 99 ** SID #101 Hansen Lake Jun 99 ** PMRNRD Western Feb 98 ** PMRNRD Cape-L Str May 98 ** LPSNRD Omaha Fish Jan 98 ** PMRNRD Union Dike Sep 98 ** PMRNRD No Name Jul 99 ** Coming Levee Dist #2 Mill Creek D.D. Jul 99 ** Fremont Co. Bd. of Sup. Whitehead Levee Jul 99 * Lodgepole Creek, Sydney Sep 99 Gering Drain, Gering Sep 99 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-40 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 264 (Continued) (See Section 25 of Text) Location Month Inspected Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Oct 99 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek Aug 99 Sioux City, Floyd River Aug 99 Hawarden, Dry Creek Aug 99 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River May 98 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 99 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 99 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 99 * West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvem Jul 99 * East Nisbnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex Jul 99 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak Aug 98 * Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA Dec 98 Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County Aug 98 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County Sep 99 * Little Sioux River, Anthon Dec 98 * Keg Creek, Minden Jul 99 * Soldier River, Near Ute Sep 98 Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees Oct 96 L601, Watkins Levee District Apr 99 L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District Apr 99 L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 Apr 99 L594, Waubansie Drainage District Apr 99 L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District Apr 99 L575, Benton-Washington Levee District Mar 99 L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District May 98 L575, McKissock Island Levee District May 98 L575, Bucbannan Levee District May 98 L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District May 99 L611-614, M & P Missouri River Levee District Sep 99 R613, Papio Natural Resources District Aug 96 R548, Little Nemaha Levee District May 99 R520, Richardson Co. Levee Dist. #8 Sep 99 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 Jun 99 R616, Sarpy County Papio Natural Resources District Aug 96 R562, Peru Levee District Sep 99 R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District May 99 * Denotes Section 14 Projects "* Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (See Section 48 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item Fiscal Year 99 Subtotal and Category SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Reconnaissance Study (121) Indian Creek, Council Bluffs, IA 60,182 Feasibility Study (121) Chatfield, Cherry Creek & Bear Creek, CO ( 422) Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE 150,027 Lower Platte River and Tribs., NE 464,166 Subtotal 673,953 Special Studies (140) None in FY 99 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Review of Completed Projects: Recon. Study (163) Chatfield, Cherry Creek & Bear Creek, CO 19,801 Review of Completed Project: Feasibility Study (164) 1,838 Subtotal 21,639 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) 142,501 FERC Licensing Activities (172) 0 Interagency Water Resources Development(173) 32,685 North American Waterfowl Management Plan(176) 2,013 Subtotal 177,199 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Cooperation With Other Water Resources Agencies (181) 21,243 Cooperation with States (186) 274,817 Subtotal -296,060 TOTAL (Category 100) 1,168,851 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) 506 Flood Plain Management, Omaha, NE 47,040 National Flood Proofing Cmet (NFPC) 8,514 Quick Responses (250) 5,991 SS -May Creek, Bismarck, ND 6,738 SS -Big Sioux River, Esteline, SD 0 SS -N. Fork, Elkhorn River, CO 8,383 SS - Montgomery County, IA 2,191 SS - Butler County, NE 1,942 SS - Polk, NE 1,280 SS- Johnson County, KS 0 SS - South Platte River, CO 141 SS - Heart River, Morton County, ND 3,992 SS - Winslow, NE, Nonstructural F.H. 29,981 SS - Glendive, MT 28,739 SS - Parkston, SD 12,844 SS -Roundup, MT 13,141 SS - Blackbird, Macy, NE 15,057 SS - Little Sioux River, Anthon, IA 22,838 Technical Services, General (250) 60,016 Hydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrologic Studies (262) 33,441 TOTAL (Category 200) 302,775 26-42 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (Continued) (See Section 48 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item Fiscal Year 99 Subtotal and Categories PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - PROJECTS NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED (Category 400) Wood River, Grand Island, NE (451) Big Sioux River, Sioux Falls, SD (451) Watertown and Vicinity, SD (451) TOTAL (Category 400) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 0 107,265 64,378 171,643 1,643,269 26-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (See Section 27 of Text) Fiscal Year 99 Project Name Stage Cost Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Disaster Preparedness (100) - 509,399 Emergency Operations (200) - 125,376 Rehabilitation & Inspection Program (300) - 670,698 Emergency Water Supplies & Drought Assistance (400) - 0 Advance Measures (500) - 23,712 Hazard Mitigation (600) - 2 Support for Others 682,013 Total (FCCE) 2,011,200 Section 205: Logan Creek, Pender, NE C 1,038,621 Aberdeen & Vicinity, SD C 327,226 Maple Creek East Fork, Howells, NE C 12,811 Milk River, Malta, MT C 6,816 Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA C 606,611 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE C 547 Salt Creek, Levees, Lincoln, NE F ( 12,935) Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO P 77,515 James River, Jamestown, ND F 16,746 Iowa & South Creeks, Ponca, NE F 66,342 Denison, IA F 38,005 Verdigre, NE F 41,059 Burt & Washington County, NE F 17,931 Livingsto, MT F 21,384 Cold Brook Creek, Hot Springs, SD F 14,922 Total (Section 205's) 2,273,601 Section 14: MO River, Richland County Road 152, MT C 9,110 Little Missouri River, E. River Rd., Medora, ND C 90,393 James River Rd. (CR 213), SD C 102,831 Cache La Poudre, CO PDA 29,908 Coulson Park Landfill, Billings, MT PDA 30,371 Total (Section 14's) 262,613 Total Flood Control Activities $4,547,414 L = Litigation R = Recon P = Plans & Specs C = Construction F = Feasibility = Does Not Apply PDA = Planning & Design Analysis (Section 14 only) 26-44 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-M PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Modification of projects for the purpose of Improving the quality of the environment in the public interest. (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended.) Fiscal Year 99 Fiscal Year 99 Study/Project and Location Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended California Bend, NE 30,543 Hidden Lake Restoration, NE 8,126 15,794 Lower Decatur Bend, NE 135,983 Boyer Chute, NE 12,663 . Missouri River Levee Unit L536 Deroin Bend, MO 32,764 Wehrspann, Lake Aquatic, NE 1,270,323 Coordination Account Funds 12,328 303,376 Initial Appraisals, General, NE 21,166 - 26-45 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT * The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City,IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) 2. Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation,IA,NE,KS, and MO General Investigations 30. General Investigations Page 27-2 27-2 Flood Control 3. Blue River Basin, Kansas City,MO 27-2 4. Blue River Channel, Kansas City,MO 27-3 5. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO 27-3 6. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS 27-3 7. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE 27-3 8. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek,KS 27-4 9. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River,KS 27-4 10. Little Blue River Lakes, MO 27-4 11. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO 27-5 12. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS 27-5 13. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 27-5 14. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) 27-5 15. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 27-6 16. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) 27-6 17. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 27-6 18. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS 27-6 19. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA 27-7 20. Smithville lake, Little Platte River,MO 27-7 21. Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO 27-7 22. Tuttle Creek Lake,Big Blue River,KS 27-7 23. Wilson Lake, Saline River,KS 27-8 24. Scheduling of Flood Control Reservoir Operations 27-8 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 27-8 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO 2 27. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO 2 Work Under Special Authorities 28. Continuing Authorities Program 2 29. Emergency Response Activities 2 27-10 Other Activities 31. Mississippi River Main Stem Model Development 32. National Emergency Preparedness 33. Missouri River Basin Collaborative Effort 34. Regulatory Program 27-10 27-10 27-10 27-10 Tables Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement 27-12 Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation 27-16 Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 27-22 Table 27-D Not Applicable Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 27-23 Table 27-F Not Applicable Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects 27-25 Table 27-H Missouri River Levee System 27-29 Table 27-I Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program 27-30 Table 27-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 27-31 Table 27-K Work Under Special Authorities Continuing Authorities Program27-32 Aquatic Ecosystem Restor 27-33 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 27-33 Emergency Response Activities 27-33 Table 27-L Active General Investigations 27-35 Table 27-M Regulatory Program 27-37 27-8 27-8 27-9 27-10 27-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER,SIOUX CITY, IA,TO MOUTH (RULO,NE,TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Montana, to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous Projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize the waterways, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. The improved reach within the Kansas City District extends from the mouth to Rulo, Nebraska, a distance of 498.4 miles. The Bank Stabilization and Navigation features of the project were completed in September 1980. For the reach from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, the total construction cost was $237,943,190 including $8,665,594 for previous project. River access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary and extreme stage fluctuations are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities may be required where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $171,816 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facility. Terminal facilities. A listing of terminal facilities are included in Missouri River Navigation Charts and can be obtained from Kansas City District Engineer for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance of dikes and revetments along the lower river was accomplished by contract. Field hired labor accomplished emergency construction of a flow control structure at the entrance of a newly formed chute. District personnel also accomplished other work items: Channel reconnaissance, stream gauging condition studies, surveys and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and layouts of construction, and supervision and administration. Project tonnage on the river for CY 1999 is estimated at 8.1 million tons, excluding waterway improvement materials. District estimates the recreation use on the Missouri River (NWK) at 1.2 million recreation days annually. 2. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MTIGATION,IA,NE,KS, and MO Location. This project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the Mouth near St. Louis, a river distance of 732 miles. This location is coincident with the Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project on the river. Existing project. The project is to mitigate losses of fish and wildlife habitat resulting from construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project. The four major components of the plan are restoration of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands (2,500 acres), preservation of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands subject to the effects of riverbed degradation (700 acres), acquisition and development of existing undeveloped habitat on private lands (28,000 acres), and development of terrestrial wildlife habitat on existing undeveloped public lands (16,900 acres). Estimated fully funded cost of the project (1999) is $84,500,000, all Federal. Both the Kansas City and Omaha Districts are involved in the implementation of the project, with Kansas City District involvement directed mainly to sites in Kansas and Missouri. Local cooperation. There is no non-Federal sponsor for the project. The states of Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri are voluntarily serving on a coordinating team, which is actively involved in ongoing project activities. Operations during fiscal year. Funding was continued for land acquisition and construction of mitigation features. Land was purchased at the following sites: Blackbird- Tieville-Decatur, Iowa and Nebraska; Nottleman Island, Iowa; Berger Bend, Nishnabotna. Lower Hamburg, and Thurnau, Missouri. Design activities were also carried out at Blackbird-Tieville-Decatur, Iowa and Nebraska; and Overton Bottoms, Missouri. Flood Control 3. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the left bank of the Blue River from U.S. Highway 71 upstream for a distance of about 1-1/4 miles in Jackson County, Missouri, to the Bannister Federal Complex levee. Existing project. The recommended project includes construction of approximately 1-1/4 miles in Jackson County, Missouri, to the Bannister Federal Complex levee. Existing project. The recommended project includes construction of approximately 1-1/4 miles of levee to 27- 2 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT provide flood protection to 280 acres in the Dodson Industrial Area and surrounding area in Kansas City. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (2003) is $12,000,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands damages and relocations is $$5,100,000. Local Cooperation. The city of Kansas City provided a letter of assurance, dated November 17, 1995, officially stating its intent to cost share the project. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design continues with preparation of the design memorandum and plans and specifications. 4. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing Project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1999) is $211,000,000, and estimated non- Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $32,500,000.. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. The City of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on December 9, 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. The Section 221 agreement was signed by the Kansas City District Engineer on September 8, 1983. Operations during fiscal year. All work on stages 1 and 2 has been completed. The Stage 3 reach of the project consists of four construction contracts. The 12-19 tStreet contract is complete. The 19t h to Stadium Drive construction contract is nearing completion. The Plans and Specifications for the remaining two contracts have been initiated. Railroad alteration contracts in the Stage 3 reach with the Kansas City Southern and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Companies have been completed. One Union Pacific Railroad bridge has been completed and the design of the remaining three bridges is underway. 5. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. A major tributary of the Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, and Johnson County, Kansas, draining a highly urbanized 29-square-mile area in the two states. Existing project. The authorized project consists of improving about 7,500 feet of the channel from near Roanoke Parkway downstream to near Troost Avenue in Kansas City. At the request of the sponsor, Kansas City, Missouri, a modified project was built which provides identical flood protection, but which also accommodates park and recreation development in the authorized reach. Estimated fully funded Federal cost of the modified project (1996) is $14,464,000; and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and cash is $19,526,000. Local cooperation. The City of Kansas City and the Corps of Engineers entered into a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) on the project in March 1991. Operations during fiscal year. The dedication of the project was in June 1995. The project was turned over to the local sponsor in January 1997. 6. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, in Douglas County, Kansas. The lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a height of about 114 feet with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial waste supply and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $57,415,433. Construction was initiated in January 1972, and the project was placed in operation in November 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $6,768,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 7,154,149 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and resurface roads. 7. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, 1-1/2 miles south of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near the center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $1,832,394 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $48,129,549. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1946. The project was placed in operation in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. 27- 3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 7,233,073 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Study of future operation. The Study of Future Operation at Harlan County Lake was delayed in FY 1996, FY 1997, and FY 1998 pending receipt of revised hydrology analyses and revised operation studies and revised operation studies from the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR). The purpose of the study is to develop an operating plan to serve the best public interest for Harlan County Lake under depleted inflow conditions. The study remains on hold; however, coordination with the BOR continues and we continue to provide input into BOR's Republican River Basin EIS as a cooperating agency. We also respond to requests from Department of Justice (DOJ) on the Kansas and Nebraska lawsuit on the Republican River Compact. 8. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 2 miles west of Hillsdale, in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Construction was initiated in December 1974, and the project was placed in operation in October 1981. Federal cost of construction was $64,161,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $21,145,338 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. The Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks has s 50-year lease on 12,880 acres for management of land and water areas for public park, recreational, and fish and wildlife purposes. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 1,116,011 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 9. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the Smoky Hill River about 184 river miles above the mouth of the stream, and about 11 miles northwest of Marquette, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on the left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Total Federal cost of project, including $249,492, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $12,577,227. Construction was initiated in June 1940, and project was placed in operation in May 1948. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 1,612,972 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 10. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES,MO Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about mile south of U,S. Highway 40, and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109t Street. Existing Project. The Blue Springs dam is an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam is an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 46,900 acrefeet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 2,000 for sedimentation). Federal cost (1992) for both lakes through construction of the project was $140,809,200. Construction was initiated in September 1977, and the project became operational in September 1988 Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28,1938 applies. Local interest must share in separable costs allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on July 5, 1974, which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Reimbursement for recreation was $15,047,000 of 27- 4 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT which $450,000 was accomplished during construction by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Project is complete. Land acquisition is complete. Visitation for FY 1999 was 3,016,406 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 11. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO Location. The Damsite is on the East Fork Little Chariton River in north central Missouri about 2 miles west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in the right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1997) is $20,288,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,605,000. Construction was initiated in March 1973. The project was placed in useful operation for flood control on September 1, 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,567,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,589,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the City of Macon, Missouri, for water supply and recreation development. Missouri State agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of the City of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979, and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 18, 1980. Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to this contract was approved December 28, 1993 to provide for additional recreational facilities. Additional facilities have been designed Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 1,328,563 visitor hours. Project is.100 percent complete on scheduled work. The remaining unscheduled work is construction of recreation facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 12. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 4 miles west of Melvernm, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Construction was initiated in July 1967, and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Project storage was reallocated in 1989 to include municipal and industrial water supply in accordance with provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958. In accordance with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding between the State of Kansas and the Department of the Army dated 1985, payment in full of $7,131,834 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was made in March 1995. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in September 1993 under an interim contract and continues under the current contract signed in January 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 6,200,482 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and completion of connection to Rural Water District at Turkey Point Park. 13. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Location. The Damsite is on the Republican River near the village of Alida about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River; and about 4 miles northwest of Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in the project at the request of the Governor of Kansas under provisions of the Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,297,649 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $49,566,492. Construction was initiated in July 1961. The project was placed in operation in June 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $12,162,134 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in October 1984. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 4,556,377 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance and tornado damage repair in the Rolling Hills Park. 14. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM IA, NE, KS AND MO (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) 27- 5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to the mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. The portion of the project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated fully funded (1999) for the active portion of the project from Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $132,238,000, including $96,612,000 Federal and $21,860,000 non-Federal contributions, and costs of $13,766,000 for lands and damages are to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Current cost estimate for deferred, inactive, and deauthorized portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $168,865,000 (1964, 1986, and 1987 price levels), of which $153,233,000 is Federal cost for construction and $15,632,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1948. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Local sponsors provide all operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Status of individual units of active portion at end of fiscal year is shown in Table 27-H on Missouri River Levee System. Unit L385 was approved for construction in FY 1994. Planning on Unit L142 continued. The Project Cooperation Agreement on Unit L385 was executed September 23,1997. 15. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Location. The Damsite is on the Delaware River about 5 miles above the mouth in Jefferson County, and about 3 miles northwest of Perry, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acrefeet (480,000 for flood control, including 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in the project plan at the request of the State of Kansas under provisions of the Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $724,212 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,095,918. Construction was initiated in March 1964, and the project was placed in operation in January 1969. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $8,551,805 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in October 1991. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 5,658,314 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 16. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 27-B for authorizing legislation and Table 27-I on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) See individual project reports. 17. POMME DE TERRE LAKE POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Location. The dam is on the main stem Pomme de Terre River, about 44 miles above the mouth in Hickory County, Missouri. The lake extends upstream into Polk County, Missouri. The site is about 4 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multipurpose). Initial cost of constructing the complete project was $14,946,784. Total Federal cost of project, including $329,140 area redevelopment and $2,089,529 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $17,365,453. Construction was initiated in January 1957, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1961. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 16,181,124 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 18. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Location. The dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 8 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. 27- 6 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet works and an ungated chutetype spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total Federal cost of project, including $731,130 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $14,003,238. Construction began in July 1959, and the project was placed in operation in October 1963. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Pomona has water supply reimbursement under Water Supply Act of 1958 totaling $862,923. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 3,914,191 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 19. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Location. The Damsite is on the Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acrefeet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total Federal cost of project, including $588,948 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), was $27,622,158. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished; and a supplement to the master plan was approved, which resulted in relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization work to compensate for the higher lake levels. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 5,754,431 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 20. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Location. The Damsite is on the Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,400 feet long crosses a saddle in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the project was $87,685,314. Construction was initiated in November 1973, and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958, and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non- Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $737,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on November 27, 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 6,931,441 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 21. TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO Location: The Turkey Creek Basin is a 23-square mile area within Kansas City, KS and suburbs in Johnson and Wyandotte Counties in Kansas. Existing Project. The recommended project is estimated to cost $42,875,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $25,596,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,279,000, including construction of channel modification and tributary flood water diversion. Local Cooperation. Latest evidence of sponsor support for design and construction is letters of support dated November 1998 from Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas City, Kansas. Operations during fiscal year. The Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) agreement was executed 29 March 1999. Completed hydrology, mapping, surveying, borings, and tunnel assessment. 22. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the main stem of the Big Blue River, about 12 miles above the stream mouth in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 5 miles north of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for 27- 7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low-flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total Federal cost of project, including $533,048 supplemental recreational development (ode 710), was $80,584,079. Construction began in October 1952. Project was placed in Operation in July 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 2,503,201 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 23. WILSON LAKE,SALINE RIVER,KS Location. The dam is on the Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near the eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low-flow regulation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total Federal cost of project, including $448,344 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $20,463,367. Construction began in April 1961, and the project was placed in operation in December 1964. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 2,149,838 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activity included ordinary operation and maintenance. 24. SCHEDULING OF FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. Fiscal Year costs were $301,000. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See Table 27-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Location. The Damsite is on the main stem of the Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet above streambed, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway and a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating units with a combined generating capability of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). The operating purposes of the project are flood control, hydroelectric power, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri, to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $550,909,000. Construction of relocated Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964. The project was operational for flood control in October 1979, and multipurpose pool was reached in November 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on December 22, 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearings required remedial repair that was completed in FY 1999. Through September 1999, power generation totaled 5,360,082,000- kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $117,815,049 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project power operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operation during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 11,421,349 visitor hours. Project is complete. During FY 1999, 536,889,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and completion of turbine repair. 27. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Location. The Damsite is on the Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with the Osage River, and about 1 mile east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri. The lake extends into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, ----- with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200-kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 27- 8 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). The authorized project purposes are flood control, hydroelectric power, water quality, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,715,300. Cost of the project, including $3,758,000 for downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $79,975,357. Construction was initiated in October 1963, and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000-kilowatt level. Rightof- way for construction of a channel cutoff and bridge at Horseshoe Bend were acquired, and construction completed. Sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills were acquired. Completion assured downstream channel capacity to Caplinger Mills of 8,000 c.f.s. for powerplant operation. Discharge in this range will accommodate power operations at a 39,500-kilowatt level. Through September 1999, power generation totaled 1,656,119,000 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $33,147,783 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1999 was 7,406,261 visitor hours. The project is complete and in operational status. During FY 1999, 57,641,000 kilowatthours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and rehabilitation and repair of powerplant bridge crane controls. Work Under Special Authorities 28. CONTINUING AUTHORITIES Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80 th Cong., June 30, 1948, as amended). Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $7 million. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit; and prevent future encroachments on improved channels. The non-Federal sponsors of Section 205 projects are required to pay 50 percent of all feasibility study costs over $100,000. For structural flood control projects, the sponsor must pay in cash during the construction at least 5 percent of the construction cost. The sponsor's cash and other contributions must equal 35 percent of the total construction cost, but will not be required to exceed 50 percent. There were no Section 205 projects under construction in Fiscal Year 1999. See Table K for expenditures under Section 205 during 1999. Emergency Streambank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79 th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Each project selected must be complete in itself, engineering feasible, economically justifiable environmentally acceptable, and limited to a Federal statutory cost of not more than $1,000,000. The local sponsoring entity must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; provide over the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 35 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limit. Construction was completed on two projects in FY 1999 that will be financially completed in FY 2000, as follows: West Fork, Grand River, Route H Bridge, MO, and Muddy Creek, Grundy County, MO, Projects were completed and turned over to the sponsors in September 1999. See Table 27-K for Emergency Streambank Protection expenditures during FY 1999. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 662, 99 th Cong., November 17, 1986). Section 1135 authorizes review of the operation of completed water resources projects to determine need for modifications for the purpose of improving environmental quality. No projects were completed in FY 1999. See Table 27-K for Section 1135 studies status and expenditures for FY 1999. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 206, Water Resources Development Act of 1996, Public Law 303, 10 4 th Cong., October 12, 1996). Section 206 authorizes small aquatic ecosystem restoration projects to improve the 27- 9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 quality of the environment if in the public interest and cost effective. No projects were completed in FY 1999. See Table 27-K for Section 206 Studies status and expenditures for FY 1999. 29. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES A. Disaster Preparedness Program. The Disaster Preparedness Program (DPP) involves planning, training, inspection, supplies and equipment, and personnel. Planning activities involve development of District response and recovery plans in support of natural disasters. Current plans within the District include the District Flood Fight Plan, Emergency Operations Center Plan, Emergency Alert and Dismissal Plan, Emergency Operations and Disaster Assistance-Deployment Plan, as well as the District Corrective Action Plan. Training activities to support disaster preparedness this year included both internal and external training exercises as well as conferences with State and local officials. A Y2K District Response Plan was developed and a Y2K exercise was conducted prior to the rollover. Disaster preparedness includes maintaining the necessary supplies and equipment to support disaster response. To support flood fighting efforts and technical assistance to the state and local officials, an inventory is maintained of over 1.5 million sandbags and, 40 pumps and sandbag filling equipment. Response operations included the October and November 1998 Missouri River floods as well as the extended April through June 1999 flood event. A minor earthquake (3.0) also occurred in Kansas City, Kansas in May 1999 causing damage to a Federal floodwall. The District also deployed its Emergency Water Team and other personnel under the Corps' Federal Response Plan role in response to the 1999 hurricanes in the southeast. B. Public Law 84-99. Rehabilitation of Flood Control Works. Several non- Federal and Federal levees were damaged as results of the October-November 1998 and the April-June 1999 floods. The District's efforts in repairing damaged flood control works totaled $1.9 million. Of that amount $924,729 was was a result of the flood events that occurred during the FY. The remainder of work effort was from the prior year events. C. Catastrophic Disaster Response Planning. New Madrid Seismic Zone Earthquake Planning. A New Madrid Earthquake exercise was conducted with the First and Fifth Army at Fort Riley, KS. The New Madrid Earthquake Operations Plan was updated to incorporate the initiatives of Readiness 2000. The District also developed the Cascadia Response and Recovery (Earthquake) Plan. General Investigations 30. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal year 1999 costs totaled $2,195,492.31 for all General Investigations activities. See Table 27-L, which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data and Preconstruction Engineering and Design expenditures in FY 1999. Other Activities 31. MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM No activity within this appropriation this fiscal year. 32. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM FY 1999 expenditures of $85,000 provided for activities required for local and national preparedness. 33. MISSOURI RIVER BASIN COLLABORATIVE WATER RESOURCES, PLANNING/ PARTNERING PROCESS Missouri River Basin Association and the Corps will manage and facilitate the process of collaboration for some limited studies. The collaborative effort allows input from the states, tribes, and Federal agencies economic and environmental interest groups and the general public on both the operation issues, i.e. Master Manual, and nonoperational issues. In addition, the collaborative process could address recreation industry development, ecosystem management, streambank erosion, project mitigation, structural changes for endangered species, environmental monitoring tribal water rights, and support to navigation and agriculture. Fiscal Year costs were $75,682. 34. REGULATORY PROGRAM Statutes. The Corps of Engineers is charged with protecting the public interest in all waters of the United States, including wetlands. This is accomplished through a Department of the Army permit program pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Operations during Fiscal Year 1999. Kansas City District completed 2,392 permit actions during the year. Of the 114 violations reported and evaluated this year, 102 were resolved by permits or voluntary restoration or administrative action. Special projects or emphases during the year included continued review of dredging data for all commercial dredgers on the Kansas River (18 sites); final monitoring report completed on impacts to endangered species from seven permits issued for gravel excavation on 27 - 10 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT the Neosho River; development of an agreement with the Missouri Conservation Heritage Foundation for in lieu fee mitigation of stream impacts; participation in a St. Louis District lead development of the Lower Missouri River wetland mitigation bank; continued development of a wetland mitigation bank in Johnson County, Kansas; completed two merged Environmental Impact Statement/Section 404 of the Clean Water Act applications for Federal Highway Administration/Missouri Department of Transportation projects; continued development of a Lake of the Ozarks general permit and consultant training program; and continued agency coordination for the development of regional conditions for the Nationwide Permits. Fiscal Year costs totaled $2,306,662 for all regulatory activities. See Table M that shows expenditures for Permit Evaluation and Enforcement. 27 - 11 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 1. Missouri River. New Work: Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 2. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE,KS & MO 3. Blue River Basin Kansas City, MO 4. Blue River Channel Kansas City, MO (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 5. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds Authorized Project Consolidated Summary 6. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp- Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,418,000 5,460,049 5,418,000 5,460,049 2,648,000 4,503,381 7,000 6,914 9,517,000 13,672,495 7,035,000 1,611,274 16,552,000 15,283,769 -50,000 -78,417 .233,000 156,569 -283,000 78,152 1,421,000 1,414,590 4,370,000 1/ 5,394,000 5,006,345 5,499,400 4,370,000 5,006,345 1,734,000 1,860,790 312,000 309,974 5,394,000 5,499,400 2,950,000 2,917,728 558,000 537,624 4,919,000 5,385,141 4,919,000 5,385,141 2,494,000 2,426,721 323,000 340,417 7,623,000 23,224,000 38,357,000 7,598,503 23,229,700 38,339,550 1,597,981 -1,000,000 1,909,237 523,944 7,623,000 22,224,000 38,357,000 9,196,484 25,138,937 38,385,470 176,000 196,529 -25,027 176,000 171,502 1,374,000 1,391,356 15,880 -819,998 117,582 -819,998 133,462 1,498,000 1,493,154 3,684 765,000 333,510 765,000 337,194 2,464,000 2,469,000 237,942,190 1/ 237,942,190 1/ 337,379,774 2/ 337,379,270 3/ 816,190 816,190 22,642 22,642 238,758,380 1/ 238,758,380 1/ 337,402,416 2/ 337,201,912 1/ 21,130,000 20,983,077 1,200,000 1,194,929 153,343,171 153,303,667 6,738,041 5,944,894 5/ 160,081,212 169,248,561 5/ 14,390,000 14,373,119 7,716,002 7,610,777 22,106,002 21,983,896 &/ 57,415,433 57,415,433 Z/ 26,635,000 26,635,000 27-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 27-A D118 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 7. Harlan County New Work: Lake, Republican River, NE 8. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS 9. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS 10. Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, MO 11. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, MO Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 12. Melvern Lake Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 13. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,529,000 1,538,711 1,333,000 1,128,655 1,748,000 1,615,900 898,000 874,775 722,000 724,290 44,707 44,707 1,598,000 1,596,101 2,091,500 2,193,483 1,477,000 1,449,128 774,000 978,231 1,524,000 1,644,406 715,000 741,235 736,000 697,100 1,348 1,348 1,623,000 1,606,853 1,502,000 1,528,992 773,000 773,114 1,266,000 1,292,359 787,000 789,435 834,000 877,245 1,611,000 1,631,492 4,594,000 1/ 1,622,000 4,413,833 4/ 1,812,038 1,860,000 1,867,001 887,000 887,000 1,280,000 1,282,500 771,000 771,000 835,000 835,000 1,846,000 1,846,000 1,818,000 1,818,000 47,111,926 47,111,9268/ 35,944,984 35,951,984 1,017,623 1,017,623 64,161,400 64,161,400 13,253,870 13,253,870 12,577,227 12,577,227 9/ 34,398,312 34,398,312 140,809,200 140,809,200 10/ 9,761,784 9,761,784 18,216,177 18,216,177 11,984,112 11,984,112 1,139,455 1,139,332 11/ 19,355,509 19,355,509 37,436,530 37,436,530 31,466,154 31,466,154 49,566,492 49,566,492 41,101,940 41,919,940 27-13 KANSAS CITY. MO. DISTRICT TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY98 FY99 Sep 30, 1999 14. Missouri River New Work: Levee System IA, NE, KS and MO 15. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 17. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 18. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS 19. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA 20. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO 21. Tuttle Creek Lake Big Blue River, KS 22. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS 23. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 115,000 316,089 1,629,000 1,627,100 1,823,000 1,805,557 2,173,000 2,171,733 2,062,500 2,126,882 1,013,000 920,636 3,196,000 3,033,190 1,385,000 1,380,235 282,000 282,000 298,000 249,182 1,757,000 1,758,054 1,849,000 1,850,621 1,704,000 1,698,224 1,928,000 1,948,639 969,000 1,051,859 907,000 859,101 1,768,000 1,771,291 1,721,000 1,736,822 1,564,000 1,572,043 1,928,000 1,918,090 1,012,000 989,947 3,306,000 1,956,000 3,448,551 4/ 2,094,153 1,382,000 1,341,516 308,000 308,000 1,301,000 1,346,829 323,000 323,000 1,375,000 1,451,985 1,902,000 1,902,000 1,824,000 1,824,000 1,786,000 178,000 2,162,000 2,179,433 1,071,000 1,102,637 1,938,000 1,938,000 1,698,000 1,698,000 301,000 301,000 67,660,851 67,624,835 49,095,918 49,095,918 39,719,343 39,806,461 17,365,452 17,365,452 37,806,461 37,806,461 14,003,238 14,003,238 34,072,207 34,072,207 27,622,159 27,622,159 43,874,211 43,874,211 87,685,314 87,685,314 18,171,848 18,171,848 80,584,079 80,584,079 43,559,232 43,559,232 20,463,367 20,463,367 31,112,604 31,112,604 57,228,452 57,228,452 27-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Sep 30, 1999 24. Inspection of Maint. Completed Flood Control Projects 25. Harry S. Truman Dam & Reservoir Osage River, MO 26. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO 30. Mississippi River Main Stem Model Development 31. National Emergency Preparedness Program 32. Missouri River Basin Collaborative Effort Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 576,000 576,000 -. 713,442 8,200,000 8,235,466 3,413,000 3,281,209 40,000 40,000 110,000 110,000 New Work: Approp. Cost 521,000 517,635 -935 7,833,000 7,650,016 3,467,000 3,096,906 50,000 49,659 174,500 174,065 229,000 228,717 583,000 586,365 8,954,000 9,162,409 3,042,000 3,516,862 426,000 426,000 6,948,000 6,991,712 4,096,000 4,144,023 341 -- 104,000 104,435 100,000 99,602 9,601,431 9,601,431 550,909,000 550,908,965 124,298,162 124,298,162 79,975,357 79,975,357 62,667,159 62,667,159 90,000 90,000 90,000 85,000 75,000 75,681 3,823,350 3,823,350 404,000 404,000 1. Includes $8,665,595 cost of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Includes funds appropriated under FY 1993 Emergency Flood Supplemental Appropriation, 96 3/7 3123: Missouri River, Rulo, NE to Mouth, $40,000; and Milford Lake, KS, $40,000 4. Includes funds expended under FY 1993 Emergency Flood Supplemental Appropriation, 96 3/7 3123: Missouri River, Rulo, NE to Mouth, $1,119,854; Milford Lake, KS $45,526; and Tuttle Creek Lake, KS $53,087. 5. Excludes $35,296 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized Blue River Channel project (Blue River Channel Mobay Chemical 1984.1987). 6. Corps is building Brush Creek Expanded Project requested by sponsor, City of Kansas City. MO, with all costs of bettern and enhancements not required by Authorized Project funded by sponsor. Excludes sponsor's contributions of $2,548,121 for Kansas City, MO, PED (FWKCM) 1987 through 1997; $2,159,888 for Park Features Design; $1,071,274 for Water Pollution Control during construction; and $1,729,155 for Public Works Department. 7. Excludes $118,805 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized Clinton Lake project (1973-1979). 8. Excludes cost of materials furnished Harlan County project without charge in the amount of $24,198. 9. Excludes cost of materials furnished Kanopolis Lake project without charge in the amount of $7,885. 10. Excludes $2,732,554 thru FY 1990 non-Federal contributions not required for authorized Little Blue Lakes project. 11. Corrected total. Excludes $42,149 interest during construction at Long Branch Lake project, and $500,000 work-in-kind. 27-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) 1. Jul 25, 1912 Aug 8, 1917 Mar 3, 1925 Jan 12,1927 Jul 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 2. Nov 17, 1986 3. Oct 12,1996 Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to mouth. Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (274.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. For a minimum width of 200 feet and depth of 6 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends, mouth to upper end of Quindaro Bend, Kansas City, MO. Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6-foot channel depth between Kansas City, MO, Quindaro Bend, and Sioux City, IA. Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, IA. Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION, MO, KS, IA & NE Project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses Missouri River Bank Stabalization and Navigation Project, MO, KS, IA & //nE: April 24, 1984, Report of Chief of Engineers, authorized at estimated cost of $51,900,000. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO Project for flood control along the left bank of the Blue River from U.S. Highway 71 upstream for a distance of about 1 1/4 miles in Jackson County, MO, to the Bannister Federal Complex levee: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Sep 5, 1996, at a total cost of $17,082,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,043,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,039,000. 27- 16 H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 241-62 H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 585-68 H. Doc.1120, 60th Cong., P.L. 560-70 P.L. 67-73 H.R. 11781 P.L. 520-71 H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 409-73 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 14-79 Title VI, Section 601(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Title I, Section 101(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1996, P.L. 104-303 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act 4. Dec 31, 1970 5. Nov 17, 1986 Nov 28, 1990 6. Oct 23, 1962 7. Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 8. Sep 3, 1954 June 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Project and Work Authorized BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Project for flood control on Brush Creek, a tributary of the Blue River, Kansas City, MO, authorized at estimated total cost of $16,100,000. Modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct the project substantially in accordance with the Post Authorization Change Report, dated April 1989 (revised January 1990), at a total cost of $26,200,000. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS The project for the Kansas River, KS,NE and CO is authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN, NE Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin, approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as amended and supplemented is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Kansas River and tributaries. It is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Osage River and tributaries. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Documents H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong. Sec. 401(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662 Water Resources Development Act of 1990, P.L. 101-640. 1962 Flood Control Act, H. Doc 578, 87th Cong. P.L. 87-874. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 780, 83rd Cong., H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 7th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 27 - 17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Se in ;e Section Date of Text Act Dec 22, 1944 10. Aug 13, 1968 11. Oct 27, 1965 12. Sep 3, 1954 13. Sep 3, 1954 14. Aug 18,1941 Dec 22, 1944 15. Sep 3, 1954 16. Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22,1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 I AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 27- 18 TABLE 27-B Project and Work Authorized I, Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Chariton and Little Chariton Rivers and tributaries, IA and MO, is authorized at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 for additional expenditure. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 for additional expenditure. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS AND MO Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to Kansas City. Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth and provided for increased protection. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DISTRICT) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Documents H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 90-483, H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong. 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298, H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong H. Docs. 642, 549 1/ and 561, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 549 1/, 81st Cong.; P.L. 780 H. Doc 821, 76th Cong. P.L. 77-228 H. Doc 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Docs. 642, 5491/, and 561, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Se in 18. Sep 3, 1954 . ._ .__.__ 27 - 19 I .e Section Date of Text Act Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 17. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Sep 3, 1954 Project and Work Authorized Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 for additional expenditure. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program. Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program. Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. Documents H. Docs. 642 and 549 1/ 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. H. Doc. 642, 549 1/, and 561, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 549 1/, 561, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act 19. Sep 3, 1954 20. Oct 27, 1965 21. Aug 17, 1999 22. Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 23 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 14, 1960 2/ 26. Sep 3, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 Project and Work Authorized RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Platte River and tributaries, MO and IA, is authorized at an estimated cost of $26,889,000. TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO Project for flood control at the lower reaches of Turkey Creek Basin in Kansas City, KS and Kansas City, MO. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of $42,875,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $25,596,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,279,000. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby mosified in accordance with recommendations of the Chief of Engineers in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., at an estimated additional cost of $43,245,000; provided, that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition of additional lands for the establishment of a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. Documents H. Doc. 561, 81st Cong., 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, 89th Cong.) Title I Section 101(a) Water Resources Development Act of 1999, P.L. 106-53 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 & 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 645 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 & 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534 S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong., P.L. 645 H. Doc. 549 1/, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 1962 Flood Control Act, H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874 27 - 20 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO 27. Sep 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River H. Doc. 549 1/, 81st Cong.; Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 1/ Contains latest published maps of Missouri River 2/ Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). 27-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 1999 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 -- Gasconade River, MO 1/2/ Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 1/ Improvement, adequate for existing needs. Project for maintenance only. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2/ Inactive portion of project deauthorized Jan 1, 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(1) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 27 - 22 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Abilene, KS Atchison, KS Barnard, KS 1/ Bartley, NE Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA 1/ Big Blue River, Seward, NE 11 Big Stranger Creek, KS 1/ Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS Indian Creek Channel Modification 1/ Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO 3/ Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO 3/ Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act) 4/ Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) East Muddy Creek, MO 3/ Elk Creek, Clyde, KS 1/ Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS 1/ Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) Indianola, NE Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS Lawrence, Kansas River, KS Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO Lower Grand River, MO 31 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO 3/ Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 Act) Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Ottawa, Osage, (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO 3/9/ Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Seward, NE 1/ Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS 1/ Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed 1961 1973 1953 1974 1994 1966 1976 1977 1973 1966 1984 1973 1966 1984 1950 1984 1980 1985 1989 1966 1967 1976 1973 1966 1976 1982 1973 1975 1967 1973 1972 1,099,350 4,099,590 127,860 118,269 652,414 126,887 337,131 269,288 2/ -- 451,400 -- 692,706 4/ -- 8,052,990 -- 989,015 -- 726,966 -- 1,271,025 -- 2,782,793 5/ -- 67,275 -- 25,010,500 6/ -- 42,434,197 7/ -- 8,773,488 8/ -- 25,530,083 -- 2,488,585 -- 432,245 -- 139,883 -- 2,036,624 -- 4,462,661 -- 5,315,168 -- 222,193 -- 700,000 -- 3,878,668 -- 126,887 -- 6,896 -- 246,995 -- 27 - 23 ,, ,, ,I ,I ,, ,, REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Topeka, Kansas River, KS Completed 1974 21,174,593 -- Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO 3/ Inactive 1966 -- -- Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO Completed 1990 1,570,000 -- Upper Grand River, MO 3/ Inactive 1966 -- -- 1/ Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2/ Required non-Federal contributions $129,680. 3I Grand River Basin reconnaissance study (authorized by resolution of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives on July 3, 1987) reviewed and updated costs for these projects authorized in the Flood Control Act of 1965, and found no economically feasible plan. 4/ Inactive units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork were deauthorized Jan 1,1990 by Section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Construction cost includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek Unit and $211,600 cost of deauthorized Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork units. 5/ Includes $130,841 non-Federal contributions. 6/ Inactive units Kansas Avenue Bridge and Approach, and Lower Argentine Units were deauthorized Jult 9, 1995 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(2) of WRDA of 1986, P.L. 99- 662. Construction cost above includes $67,500 for deauthorized Bridge and Approach Unit; does not include $1,181,000 non- Federal Contributions. 7/ Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. 8/ Includes $153,377 non-Federal contributions. 9/ Patonsburg Lake Highway Relocation and town relocation portions of the project were deauthorized Jan 1,1990 in accordance with Section 1001 (b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 27- 24 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Arlington Lake, MO Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)-- Inactive Units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork Units only 1/ Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO Fort Scott Lake Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Gasconade River Navigation, MO Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO Hays, Big Creek, KS 3/ Indian Lake, Blue River, KS Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62) Mod)--Inactive Units Kansas Avenue Bridge Approach, and Lower Argentine Units Only Kansas River Navigation 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 1965 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1977 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1974 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 281, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1976 1954 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong. 2nd Sess) 1973 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1931 Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 1928 1977 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong. 2d sess.) -- Authorized by Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1974 Flood Control Act of 1965 approved October 27, 1965 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1984 1962 Flood Control Act, S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874 1980 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, Sec. 201 $8,651 16,317 211,600 51,989 757,500 71,466 2/ 1,754,019 499,200 127,297 67,500 4/ 259,900 -- Aug 5, 1977 -- May 6, 1981 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Apr 5, 1999 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Aug 5, 1977 -- Jan 18, 1978 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Jul 9, 1995 -- Nov 17, 1986 27-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Marysville, KS Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvements) KS (1974 Act) Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS -- Flood Control Act of September 3, 1954 -- Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Section 17 1970 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 133,682 39,708 -- Jan 1967 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Nov 27, 1973 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Mill Lake, Blue River, MO Missouri River Levee System, IA, KS, MO, and NE Deauthorized by Sec. 1002 Water Resources Development Act of 1968, P.L. 99-662, Section 1002: Units R402; R393-395; and R414 Deauthorized in accordance with WRDA Section 1001(b)(1): Units L36; R42; L51; R55-59-61; L68-92; R70; L78; R87;L94; L99; L103; R104; R107; R112; L117; L121; L124; L129; L134; L137-139; L145; R150; L154; L157; R161; L164; R169; L175; R179-184; L191-196; L205; L217; R226; R240; R251; L256; R259; L263-270 5/; R272; R284; R302; R336; L353; L357; R361; L362; L392; L419-426; L435; R512-513, Section III 1971 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) -- Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. -- Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. 57,500 1,631,700 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Jan 1, 1990 27 - 26 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS Osage River Navigation, MO, lock and dam Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO ZI 1-35 Highway Relocation Town Relocation Pioneer Lake, KS Pomme de Terre Lake (Power Addition), MO Richland Lake, MO Flood Control Act of 1962, October 23, 1962 (P.L. 87-874) 1952 Original lock and dam authorized Mar 3, 1899; improvement authorized in 1928; placed in standby status Jul 1952 and operation & maintenance discontinued. 1976 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 1976 (H. Doc. 241, 89th Cong., 1st sess) 1952 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 1954 Flood Control Act of 1954 1974 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.) 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 2, 1944 2,178,261 658,076 / 393,623 91,929 95,692 8,548 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Jan 1, 1990 -- Aug 5, 1977 -- Nov 17, 1986 -- Aug 5, 1977 27 - 27 TABLE 27-G REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Tomahawk Lake, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 77,189 -- Nov 17, 1986 Blue River, KS 91st Cong., 2d sess.) Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road 1977 Sec. 18 of Water Resources 3,000 -- Nov 17, 1986 Improvement--1974 Mod.) Development Act of 1974 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS -- Water Resources Development Act of -- -- Jan 1, 1990 Road and Bridge (1976 1976, Section 189, P.L. 94-587 Act) Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 1,095,020 -- Nov 17, 1986 KS 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1/ For completed Shoal Creek unit of Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO, see Table 27-E. 2/ For completed project see Table 27-C. Deauthorized under Sec. 1001(b)(1) WRDA of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 31 Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS, Section 205 feasibility study terminated in March 1991 due to lack of identifiable project that would meet dam safety concerns. 4/ For completed Argentine, Amourdale, and Central Industrial Units of project, see Table 27-E. 5/ Incorrectly shown as R263-270 in the deauthorization act. 6/ Operation and maintenance costs $850,495. Deauthorized under Sec. 1001(b)(1) of WRDA, P.L. 99-662. 7 Pattonsburg Lake portion of project is inactive. See Table 27-E. 27 - 28 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-H MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 14 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R512-513 Richardson Co. D.D. No. 7 R500 Iowa Point D. D. No. 4 Kimsey Holly Creek L497 Forest City L. D. L488 Holt Co. D. D. No. 7 R482 Burr Oak D. D. No. 3 L476 Amazonia L. D. R460-471 Elwood-Gladden L. D. L455 S. St. Joseph L. D. L443-448 Halls L. D. R440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. D. D. L408 Farley-Beverly D. D. L400 Waldron L. D. L385 Riverside-Quindaro D. D. R351 Atherton L. D. L330-345 Orrick L. D. L319-325 Henrietta-Crooked River D. D. L246 Brunswick-Dalton D. D. L142 L15 North County L. D. Remaining units 19.1 4.1 4.4 16.0 11.5 8.2 10.8 13.8 15.6 17.3 10.7 12.2 7.6 6.5 15.9 43.4 35.0 20.0 6.0 40.0 Complete--1958 Complete--1954 Complete--1970 Complete--1962 Complete--1955 Complete--1954 Complete--1956 Complete--1968 Complete--1967 Complete--1957 Complete--1959 Complete (Levee raise modification)--1972 Complete--1957 Planning underway Complete--1966 Inactive Inactive Complete--1983 Active Active Detailed planning not initiated 27 - 29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 16 of Text) Federal Non-Federal Non-Federal Project Status Cost Cost Reimbursable Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS C $1,099,350 $287,000 Bartley, Republican River, NE C 118,269 9,500 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS D 71,186,000 19,314,000 $44,800,000 5/ Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS D 71,466 -- Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE C 48,129,549 -- Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO C 550,908,965 -- 138,385,000 6/ Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS C 64,161,400 -- 21,145,338 5/ Indianola, Republican River, NE C 67,275 7,592 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS C 12,577,227 -- Lawrence, Kansas River, KS C 8,620,111 2,130,000 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS C 2,488,585 265,000 Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 37,436,530 -- 7,131,834 7/ Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Authorization) D -- -- Milford Lake, Republican River, KS C 49,566,492 -- 12,162,134 5/ Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth 8/ A 93,553,000 35,265,000 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 2,036,624 348,300 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 4,462,661 876,000 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS C 49,095,918 -- 8,551,805 5/ Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO C 17,365,453 -- Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS C 14,003,238 -- 862,923 5/ Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS C 3,878,668 1,960,000 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO C 79,975,357 -- 24,206,593 9/ Topeka, Kansas River, KS C 21,174,593 10,383,492 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS C 80,584,079 -- 2,333,916 5/ Tuttle Creek Lake, KS--Road and Bridge (1976 Act) D -- -- Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Modification) D 3,000 -- Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS C 20,463,367 -- j./ Status: A = Active; C = Completed; D = Deauthorized; Z/ In accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding I = Inactive. 2/ Actual appropriations for completed and deauthorized projects; estimated appropriation requirements for active and inactive projects. 31 Estimated cost during construction. 4/ Future reimbursement of initial Federal cost. 5/ Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to water supply. G/ Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to power. between the State of Kansas and the Dept. of the Army dated 1985, payment in full of $7,131,834 for 50,000 acrefeet of water supply was made in March 1995. 8/ Active portion of project. Currently estimated cost (1997): Deferred portion of project--$46,753,000 Federal and $4,336,000 non-Federal; Inactive portion of project-- $104,791,000 Federal and $11,296,000 non-Federal. Actual cost of deauthorized units (1990) is $1,689,200 Federal. 9/ Includes $22,116,864 estimated reimbursement costs allocated to power, and $2,089,729 estimated reimbursement costs allocated to water supply. 27 - 30 TABLE 27-1 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 27-J (See Section 25 of Text) Project Missouri River Main Stem R482, R500, R440 and Atchison, KS Birmingham (KCMO) Fairfax Jersey Creek (KCK), L408, L400, R471-460, R351 I, R351 II North Kansas City (Lower Section), GSA Complex (KCMO) KCMO Units--CID (MO), East Bottoms, NKC-Airport, Blue River Channel, Brush Creek, L448-443 L455 L246, Lower Chariton River Unit, New Haven L476, L488 Kimsey Holley Creek R512-513 Kansas River North Topeka, Soldier Creek, Auburndale, South Topeka, Waterworks Unit, Oakland Manhattan, KS Ft Riley Lawrence, KS Kaw Valley--Argentine, Armourdale, Lower Fairfax, CID (KS) Osage River (MO) Marais des Cygnes (KS) Ottawa, KS Osawatomie, KS Smokey Hill, Saline. Solomon Rivers & Tributaries (KS) Abilene, KS, Barnard, KS Salina, KS Gypsum, KS Republican River Clyde, KS Indianola, NE Big and Little Blue Rivers (KS & NE) Frankfort, KS Fairbury, NE, Seward, NE Little Blue River (MO) Little Blue River Channel, Jackson County, MO Lake City AAP, MO Miscellaneous Stonehouse Creek--Williamstown, KS Bedford Project--Bedford, IA Shoal Creek--Livonid, MO, Macon-Adair Creek--Kirksville, MO Month Inspected Apr-1999 Jun-1999 May-1999 May-1999 Jun-1999 Jun-1999 Aug-1999 Sep-1999 Nov-1999 Oct-1999 Apr-1999 May-1999 Jun-1999 Sep-1999 Oct-1 999 Jun-1999 Jun-1999 Jun-1999 Oct-1999 Oct-1999 Apr-1999 Oct-1999 Apr-1999 Sep-1999 Aug-1999 Aug-1999 Sep-1999 Apr-1999 Aug-1999 27- 31 . REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 27-K WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES (See Section 28 of Test) Fiscal Year Study Status 1/ Cost Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, June 30, 1948, as Amended Section 205 Coordination Account Mitchell and Pearson Creeks, Waynesville, MO Mill Creek', Olathe, KS St Joseph, MO Excelsior Springs, MO Parkville, MO Brunswick, MO TOTAL FOR COORDINATION AND SIX ACTIVE PROJECTS: $12,289 1,195 51 39,447 40,000 20,000 20,000 $132,982 TOTAL ALL SECTION 205 ACTIVITIES $132,982 Emergency Streambank Protection--Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act Public Law 526, 79th Congress, July 24, 1946, as Amended Section 14 Coordination Account Chariton River, MO Delaware River Water Intake, Kickapoo Reservation, KS Flat Creek, MO Grand River, Route A Bridge, MO Grand River, Chariton County, MO, Salt Creek Bridge Hinkson Creek, Columbia Sewermain, MO Kansas River, Eudora Bend Bridge, KS Little Blue River Barnes Road 0 Muddy Creek, Grundy County, MO Platte River Bridge, Conception, MO West Creek, Topeka, KS West Fork, Grand River, Route H Bridge, Gentry County, MO West Fork, Grand River, Route W Roadway TOTAL FOR COORDINATION AND 13 ACTIVE PROJECTS TOTAL ALL SECTION 14 PROJECTS D C D D C D D D C D C C C $14,100 6,227 8,931 6,690 61,179 5,202 37,901 32,367 5,727 106,026 5,036 233,543 202,555 330,625 $1,056,109 $1,056,109 27 - 32 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, November 17, 1986 Coordination Account Funds Initial Appraisals, General Blue Springs Lake Habitat, MO Milford Lake Habitat Restoration, KS Rathbun Lake Habitat Restoration, IA TOTAL ACTIVE SECTION 1135 TOTAL ALL SECTION 1135 ACTIVITIES Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Section 206, Water Resources Development Act of 1996 Public Law 303, 104th Congress, October 12, 1996 Coordination Account Funds -- Preliminary Restoration Funds I Lake Nemaha Wetlands, KS F Straightwater Marsh, Wetland Habitat F TOTAL SECTION 206 ACTIVITIES 1/ Status: I = Initial; D = Planning and Design Analysis; F = Feasibility; P = P&S; C = Construction; O =Operational Emergency Response Activities (See Section 28 of Text) Emergency Flood Control Activities--Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work-- Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation Activity FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Disaster Prepardness Program--100 Planning Activities Training and Exercise Facilities National Centers for Expertise Total Disaster Preparedness Program Approp 96X3125 FY 98 Expenditures $382,481 15,787 49,429 0 $447,697 27 - 33 $7,684 18,019 11,441 9,728 33,052 $97,924 $97,924 $7,855 9,479 99,849 1,000 $118,183 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Emergency Operations--200 Response Operations--210 Acquisition of Supplies & Equipment Operational Deployment Total Emergency Operations Rehabilitation--300 Federal Flood Control Works Non-Federal Flood Control Works Field Investigation Inspections Interagency Levee Activities Total Rehabilitation Hazard Mitigation--600 Hazard Mitigation Team Activities FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES TOTAL FEDERAL NON-REIMBURSEABLE ACTIVITIES SPONSOR'S CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Maintenance--300 Non-Federal Flood Control Works--320 $449,550 24,978 9,911 $484,439 $273,707 102,526 141,220 3,337 57,343 $578,133 1,807 $1,512,076 Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds Approp 96X8862 Expenditures $13,945 TOTAL ALL EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES EXPENDITURES 27 - 34 $1,526,021 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-L ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 30 of Text) Federal Cost Total By Item and PWI Number FY 99 Category SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Swope Park Industrial Area, Kansas City, MO--012821 Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) MRLS, Units L455 and R460-471 (013267) Topeka, KS--013200 Kansas City, MO & KS--013268 Wilson Lake, KS--020060 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations--017250 Interagency Water Resources Development--014713 North American Waterfowl Mgmt--053904 Subtotal Coordination with Other Agencies and Non-Federal Interests (180) Coop with Other Water Resources Agencies (181)--053907 Planning Assistance to States (186) Subtotal $151,376 $151,376 $89,457 280,075 351,449 88 $721,069 $149,452 7,868 3,404 $160,724 $14,939 126,019 $140,958 TOTAL SURVEYS (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Service Unit--082030 Technical Services--082040 Quick Responses--082045 Flood Plains Management Study--082500 Special Studies Mo River Flood Plain Eval, MO--083608 Missouri SEM MRCS--083614 Lindsburg, KS Brush Creek, Jackson Co., MO NorthmoOr, MO Line Creek, Maps Subtotal $1,174,121 $32,175 39,958 4,500 -613 3,857 27,579 4,000 35,000 35,000 $181,456 27 - 35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITY FOR FY 1999 Hydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrology Studies--053820 $33,822 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA $215,278 (Category 200) PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Flood Control Projects (Project Not Fully Authorized) (Category 450) Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO--012381 $465,672 Flood Control Projects (Fully Authorized Project) (Category 600) Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO--012563 340,417 TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN $806,089 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $2,195,494 27 - 36 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-M item and PWI Number PERMIT EVALUATION (100) REG--Permit Evaluation--008204 ENFORCEMENT (200) REG--Enforcement--008205 GRAND TOTAL REGULATORY PROGRAM REGULATORY PROGRAM (See Section 34 of Text) Federal cost FY 99 $1,817,624 489,038 $2,306,662 27 - 37 __ __ __ PORTLAND, OR DISTRICT * The territorial limits of the Portland District include the below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, O R and W A .............................. ...... .................... .. 28-2 2. Chetco River, OR ..................................... 28-2 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ...................... 28-2 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA .................... 28-3 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island ......................................... . 28-4 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA ........... 28-4 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR .................................... 28-4 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial Hammond, OR ..................................... 28-5 9. Coos Bay, OR ..................................... 28-5 10. Coquille River, OR ........................................... . 28-6 11. Depoe Bay, OR ..................................... 28-7 12. Port Orford, OR ..................................... 28-7 13. Project Condition Surveys ................................. 28-7 14. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR .............. 28-7 15. Siuslaw River, OR ..................................... 28-7 16. Skipanon Channel, OR ...................................... 28-8 17. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR ................................. 28-8 18. Umpqua River, OR .......................................... 28-9 19. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR ............. 28-9 20. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR .......................... 28-10 21. Yaquina River, OR ............................................. 28-10 Flood Control 22. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ............ 28-11 23. Blue River Lake, OR ....................................... 28-11 24. Cottage Grove Lake, OR ................................. 28-11 25. Dorena Lake, OR ..................................... 28-11 26. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ........... 28-12 27. Fall Creek Lake, OR ....................................... 28-13 28. Fern Ridge Lake, OR ...................................... 28-13 29. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects . 28-13 30. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA. ................................... 28-14 31. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA ................ 28-14 32. Scappoose Drainage District, OR .................... 28-14 33. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .28-15 34. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR ..... 28-15 35. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR ............... 28-15 Page Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 36. Bonneville Lock and Dam Lake Bonneville, OR and WA ......................... 28-15 37. Columbia River Fish Mitigation, OR and W A ..................................................... 28-16 38. Columbia River Treaty Fishing Sites, OR and W A ................................ .................. 28-17 39. Cougar Lake, OR ..................................... 28-17 40. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR ......................... 28-18 41. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ......................... 28-18 42. Hills Creek Lake, OR ...................................... 28-19 43. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA ............................. 28-19 44. Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR .................... 28-19 45. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ........... 28-20 46. The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lake Celilo, WA and OR ................................. 28-21 Work Under Special Authorities 47. Projects Not Specifically Authorized ................ 28-21 48. Emergency Response Activities ....................... 28-23 General Investigations 49. Surveys ..................................... 28-24 50. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................. 28-24 51. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ............ 28-24 Tables Table 28-A Cost & Financial Statement ................ 28-25 Table 28-B Authorizing Legislation ...................... 28-32 Table 28-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................................... 28-38 Table 28-D Not Applicable Table 28-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................................... 28-39 Table 28-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ................... 28-41 Table 28-G Deauthorized Projects ........................ 28-41 Table 28-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ...................................... 28-42 Table 28-I Project Condition Surveys .................. 28-42 28-1 _ _ _ ~I~ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Page Table 28-J Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks ............................................. 28-42 Table 28-K Flood Control Reservoir Operations ...... 28-43 Table 28-L Work Under Special Authorities, Projects Not Specifically Authorized .................. 28-44 Page Table 28-M Work Under Special Authorities, Emergency Response Activities ............. 28-45 Table 28-N Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, and Powerplant.... 28-46 Table 28-0 Bonneville Power Administration Financial Statement ............................ 28-48 Navigation 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 40 miles east of Portland, OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over the sill. Construction ofa new navigation lock just south of the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88, August 15, 1985. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent of the project cost in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. The new lock chamber is 86 feet wide and 675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. Estimated cost for construction of the new navigation lock is $348,100,000. Construction of the lock is completed. The lock opened to shipping on March 26, 1993. Restoration of the grounds and historic buildings is complete. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued real estate activities to obtain title to project lands. 2. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification of 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction ofjetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was completed in March 1970. The authorization was modified by WRDA 92 to "direct the Secretary of the Army to assume maintenance of the approximately 200-foot long access channel to the south commercial boat basin consistent with authorized project depths". This channel will be maintained in lieu of the small boat access channel. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 39,813 cubic yards of material was removed by the contract hopper dredge Westport. The sand bypasser Sandwick worked five days. 3. COLUMBIAAND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, and 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington.) Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from the mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth ofWillamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 28-2 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens, (Oregon); and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended to its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30- foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth of Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver, about 3 feet at low stage of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver, they average about 12 feet, while highest know reached a stage of 33 feet above water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette river and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) A feasibility study for deepening the Columbia and Lower Willamette navigation channel is being conducted in cooperation with the Association of Lower Columbia River Ports. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift-on-lift-off and roll-on-roll-off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the west coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement, and steel products. At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll-on-roll-off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details, see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 5.7 million cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 2.1 million cubic yards, the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 457,500 cubic yards, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed about 3 million cubic yards, and the contract hopper dredge Padre Island removed 467,000 cubic yards. The sand bypasser Sandwick worked 27 days in the Cowlitz Old Mouth Channel. The easternmost 400 feet of the East Astoria Boat Basin North Breakwater was repaired with new sheetpile. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2,000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging 28-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, was finished December 1957, and again, deepening of the west channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 107, finished the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Performed condition surveys. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing Project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook; a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. Aportion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Initiated (mobilized and started dredging) a clamshell dredging contract that will be completed in FY00. 6. COLUMBIA RIVERAT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Section 3. Existing project. Provides for a one-half-mile-wide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A" is about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A') was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 1984. In FY 95 a 500 foot section of the south jetty was removed to allow unimpeded access by fisheries resources to 603 acres of intertidal habitat under Section 1135 authority. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 4.2 million cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 1.8 million cubic yards of material, and the contract hopper dredge Padre Island removed 2.4 million cubic yards. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, See Section 3, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and 28-4 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 17 feet, which is adequate for user traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government Island completed 1985 under section 107. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, WA, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of paper-mill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There is a one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. Aprivate elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and barges. At numerous locations along the entire waterway there are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 69,000 cubic yards. 8. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Location. The memorial will be located at Point Adams, in the City of Warrenton, OR, at River Mile 8.5 on the Columbia River approximately 50 yards off shore and adjacent to an existing Corps of Engineers pile dike. Existing project. None. Local cooperation. ALocal Cooperation Agreement (LCA) with the local sponsor, City of Warrenton, OR, is being developed. This LCA will require the sponsor to pay for all costs above the authorized $150,000 for engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a support structure to serve as the foundation for the Seafarers Memorial. In addition, the sponsor is providing the statue for which the foundation structure is being built. Operations during fiscal year. All work has been suspended until the LCA has been approved by all parties and the local sponsor has raised sufficient funds for purchase of the statue and any costs above the $150,000 limit for the support structure. 9. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance of Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1989. Construction of 28-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 to Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) A modification to the existing project was authorized in the FY 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public Law 104-46, November 13, 1995. This authorization provided for deepening the channel by 2 feet to 47 feet below mean lower low water (MLLW) from the entrance to Guano Rock (river mile 1) and to 37 feet below MLLW from river mile 1 to 15. Public Law 104-46 also provided for deepening by two feet and expanding the turning basin at river mile 12 by 100 feet from 800 by 1000 feet to 900 by 1000 feet. The excavation material for the channel deepening was transported to the ocean for disposal. The cost for preparation of the plans and specifications and the construction of the project was $11,616,000, of which $8,116,000 was federal and $3,500,000 was non-federal. In addition, the sponsor paid 100 percent of the estimated cost for dredging the berth areas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. The sponsor, International Port of Coos Bay, signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on May 8, 1996 for the project modification to deepen the channel as authorized in Public Law 104-46. In accordance with cost sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the Federal Government provided 75 percent of the costs associated with the general navigation features of the project. The non-federal sponsor was required to provide 25 percent of the total construction cost of the general navigation features up front. The sponsor was also required to provide an additional 10 percent of the cost of the general navigation features of the project in cash over a period not to exceed 30 years. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300-foot, 576-foot and 500-foot frontages, respectively. In the North Spit industrial area, there is one woodchip loading facility having a frontage of 1200 feet and a smaller Tdock operated by the Port of Coos Bay. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. A barge slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat basins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to deepen the channel was awarded on May 23, 1996 and was completed in March 1997. A second contract was awarded in June 1997. The project construction was completed in first quarter of fiscal year 1998, except for post construction monitoring which is scheduled to continue through fiscal year 2000. Maintenance: A total of 1,722,200 cubic yards of material was removed. The US hopper dredgeYaquina removed 154,500 cubic yards; the contract hopper dredge Padre Island removed 697,200 cubic yards and the contract dredges Seattle and Paula Lee removed 870,500 cubic yards. The sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 16 days in Charleston entrance channel. 10. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. Port of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction with protective breakwater and entrance channel construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) A plan to deepen the entrance channel of the Coquille River from 13 feet to 18 feet was approved in May 1988. The economics were reevaluated in FY1993 and the project was not economically feasible at that time. Local cooperation. Restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects funding, required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). 28-6 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: contract hopper dredge Westport removed 18,415 cubic yards of material from the entrance channel. 11. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modifications, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, were accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A project condition survey and miscellaneous inspections were performed. 12. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 55-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October, 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. The authorization was modified by WRDA 92 to allow the Corps to maintain the authorized navigation channel within 50 feet of the port facility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. Expansion of the dock structure to 210 x 220 feet is complete. The installation of the second hydraulic crane was completed in FY 1986. About 150 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During the summer months the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 48 days. A contractor dredged 6,508 cubic yards during the winter season. 13. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted during the fiscal year at a cost of $84,168; (See Table 28-I). 14. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon; flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. In 1985, three pile dikes, located on the south side of channel oceanward of the boat basin entrance, were completed. At the direction of Congress, the boat basin entrance channel was relocated approximately 1,000 feet upstream to a new opening in the breakwater provided by the Port of Gold Beach. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderbum, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderbum and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Completed engineering studies on relocation of the boat basin access channel. 15. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 19583 and 18580.) 28-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. (For details relating to previous project, see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty modifications were completed in FY 86. Modifications provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originates approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Modem docks for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by the Davison Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscalyear. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 43,490 cubic yards of material. 16. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 7 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to pubic on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use by a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility for chips and lumber. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 9,754 cubic yards of material from the outer channel. 17. TILLAMOOK BAYAND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alignment extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956 and small-boat basin in 1958. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1965 and again in 1991. South jetty construction was initiated in 1969, extended in 1974, and completed to the authorized 8,000 feet in 1978. 18 foot channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For details relating to previous projects, 28-8 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition surveys were performed. 18. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed in 1984. Project was modified in 1951 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August, 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 228,153 cubic yards of material, and the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 18 days at Winchester Bay. 19. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Canal and locks were originally constructed by private interest in 1873 and were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in the Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. The project includes four locks a canal basin and an extra guard lock used to prevent flooding when river levels are high. The system acts as a fluid staircase between the upper and lower reaches of the Willamette River. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 28-J. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Until the 1940's, the gates were opened manually. Now, the gates are operated by hydraulic pumps controlled by switches in two control stations with the aid of closed-circuit television and radio communication. All the gates have been replaced under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in good condition and in continuous operation. New service building was completed in 1988 costing $523,000. The project was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1974, and was established as an Oregon Civil Engineering Landmark in 1991. As a result of the mill closure in 1996, one of two shifts was eliminated and hours of operation reduced. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Simpson Paper closed the mill in 1996 after over 100 years of operations. The mill was sold to West Linn Paper. West Linn Paper has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United States. The use of the wharf for operations purposes by the mill may be changed due to shipping changes by the new owner. 28-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. 20. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Yaquina Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus atYaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1978 and again in 1988. (For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956- 57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port ofNewport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage of 120 boats, is completed. A swing hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 165,836 cubic yards. Contract hopper dredge Westport removed 94,711 cubic yards. 41,217 tons of displaced jetty stone were removed from the entrance channel to alleviate dangerous navigation conditions. 21. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows about 50 miles in a westerly direction, and empties into Yaquina Bay, on Oregon coast. (See US Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 5802 and 6058.) Existing project. Provides for two controlling half-tide dikes of piling, brush, and stone, each about 1,100 feet long (constructed by local interests), and for a channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depot Slough, extending from town of Yaquina near RM 4.0 to Toledo at RM 14.4. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme about 12 feet. Freshet heights are about 12 feet at mouth of Depot Slough. Channel work authorized March 1913 was completed in 1914. Additional work authorized in 1960 was completed in 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Near town of Yaquina at river mouth, which is also head ofYaquina Bay, there is a moorage for small vessels and a small-craft shipyard. The Port of Toledo has public-terminal facilities for accommodation of local craft. There are also privately owned facilities for loading lumber barges, receipt of bunker fuel, and log rollways for receipt of logs. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: None required. 28-10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Flood Control 22. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities were provided by the Corps of Engineers with operation and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of agreement. Project is complete and operating. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 28-K. 23. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-andgravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as aunit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) was granted a FERC license in November 1989 to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. EWEB has delayed their plans for hydropower units pending the conclusion of a Corps proposal to add water temperature control to the regulating outlet tower. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 28-K. 24. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. On Coast Fork ofWillamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at five sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work continued. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 25. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gatecontrolled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir 28-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigational and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since Sept. 1976. It includes 4 projects and 14 parks. At Dorena Lake, 6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane County under a lease agreement. Future recreation development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 28-K. 26. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Construction work for the 249-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam has been stopped due to a court injunction. The project would control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles, and provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of roads and the main dam structure and outlet works to elevation 1563 (approximately 1/3 proposed height). All lands for the project have been acquired with the exception of the clearing of water rights for a seemingly abandoned irrigation canal which originates within the project boundaries. Environmental statements were filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement No. 1 addressing water quality and social/demographic information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. Estimated federal cost of project is $174,000,000. In October 1985, the Corps was advised by Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC), an environmental group, they intended to file suit against the government to halt construction of Elk Creek, on specific environmental issues. A hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction was scheduled before Oregon Federal District Court December 16, 1986. On that date, the Court refused to grant the injunction to halt construction and bids were opened and the contract subsequently awarded to Ohbayashi Corp. An appeal was filed by ONRC in March, 1986 and heard by the 9th Circuit Court in July, 1986. On June 23, 1987, the Circuit Court reversed the decision of the District Court and returned the case to the District Court for appropriate injunctive relief. The resulting District court order issued in August and September 1987 allowed construction of the dam to El. 1563 ft. (approximately 1/3 the height of the dam), backfilling of the foundation key trench, aggregate processing, quarry restoration, and other miscellaneous work. The construction of the main dam to elevation 1563 was reached in mid-January 1988. The Department of Justice petitioned the 9th Circuit Court for a rehearing. On December 10, 1987 the 9th Circuit Court rejected the petition for a rehearing, requiring the termination of the existing main dam and reservoir clearing contracts. The Department of Justice petitioned with the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of the decisions made by the 9th Circuit Court. The hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court was held May 1, 1989. The U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case back for injunctive relief. In September 1989, the District Court was requested by the Corps to remand the case back to the Corps for preparation of a supplemental EIS. To lift the injunction against the dam a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EISS) has been prepared to address cumulative effects. Additional studies have been conducted in water temperature and turbidity, and fish and wildlife. The EISS identified a preferred interim operating alternative of operating the project without a conservation pool. The reservoir would only temporarily store water during flood control operations. On July 22, 1992, the Department of Justice filed a motion with the court to remove the injunction. A hearing was held on May 20, 1993. The ONRC and Department of Justice filed appeals with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals over the issues of the legal sufficiency of the EISS and on the authority of the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to issue a determination of impacts under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The Ninth Circuit Court ofAppeals ruled on the two cases on April 21, 1995. In a unanimous decision, the Court ruled that the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management do not have a veto authority over purely Federal projects under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act where Congress makes the decision to authorize and fund their development. In a 2-1 decision, the Court also reversed the District Court decision that EISS #2 met the requirements of the earlier Ninth Circuit opinion and awarded attorney fees to the plaintiffs. The case was remanded with instructions to prepare a third supplement adequately addressing all issues raisedunder the NEPAprocess. In FY 1993, Congress added $2,500,000 for design necessary to complete the project pending removal of the injunction. In FY97 Congress made the remainder of these funds available to plan and implement long term management measures. Due to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, the Corps will not perform the environmental studies under NEPA necessary to remove the Federal court injunction. The Corps notified Congress of its intention to begin studies of options for long term management of the project in its uncompleted state. Studies are on hold awaiting funding. 28-12 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain a minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities require a local sponsor willing to cost share in recreation development and assume operations and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Operation during construction continued. 27. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Bethel School District. Bethel School District has a sub-agreement with the Springfield Kiwanis Club for management of this facility. The Corps manages one park at the project. Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of the Middle Fork, Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 28. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane county, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A maindam 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary oflake. Main dam consists ofan earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with anon-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Construction of three waterfowl impoundments was completed in 1994 under Section 1135 authority. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane county, and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Three parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreements. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water for migratory waterfowl under a lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 28-K. 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. Numerous leveed areas and 213 bank protection works were inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin are supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Fiscal year costs were $123,628. 28-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 30. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, ORAND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. A total of 191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $28,000,000. Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Local Interests will also be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each site. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $2,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. 31. MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems impacted by the project include Toutle, Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the problems reside in the communities ofLongview, Kelso, Lexington, and Castle Rock, Washington. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88, 99th Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization "... to construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention structure near the confluence of the Toutle and Green River, Washington, with such design features and associated downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 1984." The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Decision document recommended construction of a single sediment retention structure (SRS) with a 125-foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. Local cooperation. Local interests were responsible for provision of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, and levee improvements. Local interests were also responsible for all alterations and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites are the responsibility of local interests. Cowlitz County offers visitor services in their viewpoint area. Nonfederal cash contribution is $3,600,000 and the estimated nonfederal land, easements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are $21,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Coordination with Federal and local agencies continued. Initiated an engineering reanalysis of anticipated erosion and deposition of the debris avalanche. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. 32. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Location. Scappoose Drainage District is located in Columbia County, Oregon, along the left bank of Multnomah Channel opposite Columbia River Miles 90.3 to 97.0. Project Description. The project, as originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, provided for reconstruction of the existing levee system. Additional improvements, as provided for in the Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950, consisted of raising and strengthening 52,000 feet of levee, construction of toe drains, and additional pumping capacity. The project as originally authorized was completed in 1941. The additional improvements were completed in September 1980. The main pumping plant was constructed by the Corps of Engineers as part of a comprehensive plan for upgrading the flood protection works to provide protection against the Standard Project Flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second as measured at The Dalles, Oregon. This equates to a flood level of 27.8 feet and 26.2 at the upstream and downstream ends, respectively, of the drainage district. The four pumps at the main pumping plant did not operate properly during the February 1996 flood. The problem began when the Columbia River exceeded the ordinary high water level of 14 feet. At that point, the pumps started to overheat and shut down. When the river stage reaches approximately 22.5 feet, the motor overload protection trips out. Emergency measures were taken by rotating the operation of the pumps. All pump motors overheated and only one pump at a time in rotation could be operated. The reduced pumping capability induced interior flooding that caused extensive damage to a large plant nursery, flooded residential properties, and cut off access to interior drainage channel pump stations. The pumps were designed to operate with river stages from +1.0 to 26.6 feet. The river crested at 26.6 feet during the flood. During the February 1996 flood the pumps were tested under major flooding conditions for the first time. Corrective action was to replace the existing pump impellers having a 17 degree pitch with impellers having 14.5 degree pitch. The cost for this corrective action was $119,000, which was 100% Federal. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 28-14 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. New work: Replaced pump bearings and motor heaters. 33. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins), one local project operated by Douglas County (Galesville), and one municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light (Mossyrock). The projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. The four Bureau of Reclamation projects, Douglas County project and Mossyrock project were operated during the fiscal year within the flood control regulations specified for each project. Total cost of monitoring and flood control direction of the six projects during the fiscal year was $62,808. 34. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $30,700,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of 489,795 linear feet of bank protection work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 and Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $2,300,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with potential sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. Maintenance: Continued coordination and evaluation of local erosion problems. 35. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream fromjunction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs (cubic feet per second), an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has leased recreation facilities at Willow Creek Lake. A courtesy handling dock was constructed by the Recreation District utilizing Oregon State Marine Board funds. A playfield area below the dam has been leased to the City of Heppner. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provisions of the Clear Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 36. BONNEVILLE LOCKAND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE, ORAND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River, see Section 3. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Cascade island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 verticallift steel gates, 10 with remote control hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway provides access, and two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of one unit of 48,000 kilowatts, one unit of 59,500 kilowatts, and eight units of 60,000 kilowatts each, totaling 587,500 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough Channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and powerhouses are founded on andesite, and main dam rests on solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 27 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock, spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 28-N. 28-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest-Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provided for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,145.7 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction ofproject started October 1933, was completed February 1943. Modification ofpowerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse complete. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality inApril 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 2,700,000 project wide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) is an integral part of that structure. The total cost for construction of the second powerhouse is $678,945,000. In June 1993 work began on the rehabilitation of the First Powerhouse. In the first phase the existing circuit breakers and ten transformers were replaced and the switchyard was rehabilitated. Circuit breaker work was completed in 1995. The remaining work was completed in 1997. Phase I cost was $24,120,000. The second phase consists of replacing the windings of five generators and replacing ten turbines. Second phase work was contracted in 1994 and is scheduled to be completed in 2009. Phase II will cost an estimated $104,600,000. The first powerhouse, spillway, navigation lock and associated facilities have been designated as aNational Historic District. Development of recreation facilities at Home Valley was completed in FY 1989. Through September 1999, power generation totaled 256.4 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $671.0 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for non-federal cost-sharing for development of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Real estate actions regarding highway, railroad, and City of North Bonneville relocations were completed. The remaining deeds were officially turned over to the City of North Bonneville. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Repair of Unit 16 stator winding and rewedge repairs were initiated. Initiated navigation lock gate retensioning. Routine operation and maintenance was performed with enhanced maintenance on the turbines. During the fiscal year 5,946,491,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 5,918,077,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Major Rehabilitation: A contract to rehabilitate the generators and turbines in the first powerhouse is in progress. Initiated bridge crane repair. 37. COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR AND WA Location. At Bonneville, The Dalles, and John Day Dams on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. This project encompasses work at five other locations within Walla Walla District. Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric projects on the lower Columbia and Snake Rivers have been identified as a major contributing factor in causing mortality to migrating salmon and steelhead. Without adequate bypass facilities to guide juvenile fish away from the power turbines at the dams, mortalities incurred through project passage severely impact the commercial, recreational, and Indian fisheries. The Corps has recognized the need to reduce juvenile mortality and has undertaken bypass measures that include mechanized fish bypass systems with barge and truck transportation. Spill as an additional bypass route over the spillways has been used to divert fish from entering turbine units, but it is a significant adverse economic factor due to lost power revenues. Congress 28-16 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT passed and the President signed the FY 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of funds for the design, testing, and construction of new or improved fish bypass facilities for the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation projects. Completion of the bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the juvenile and adult fish bypass facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The plan of improvement within Portland District includes the following: (a) Bonneville - new juvenile fish monitoring facilities, and outfall relocation; (b) The Dalles - submerged extended fish screens and bypass system, new gantry crane and maintenance facility; (c) John Day - new juvenile fish monitoring facility, and planning and design for potential drawdown of the reservoir to minimum operating pool; (d) a mitigation study that analyzes long-term alternatives including impacts of federal Columbia River system and other activities on estuary habitat, surface bypass technology, gas abatement and improved turbine passage to improve fish passage and survival through Corps dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. The current fully funded total estimated Federal project cost is $1,386,000,000 which includes $778,400,000 for improvements in Walla Walla District, $597,817,000 in Portland District and $9,783,000 provided by the Bonneville Power Administration for design of the Bonneville juvenile fish monitoring facility. For information on the planned improvements in the upper Columbia and Snake Rivers, see Walla Walla District's Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: General: Continued to collect biological and hydraulic data at all projects, and develop alternatives to improve existing anadromous fish bypass methodology and systems, to reduce excess dissolved gas entrainment associated with use of the spillways and to improve turbine passage survival. Bonneville Dam: Completed construction of new juvenile bypass outfall for the second powerhouse, construction of bypass improvements inside the powerhouse, a transportation flume to the new outfall, continued construction of the juvenile fish monitoring facility. Initiated evaluation of improvements for fish guidance efficiency at Bonneville Second Powerhouse. Performed biological analysis of a surface collection prototype system at the first powerhouse. The Dalles Dam: Continued sluiceway and spillway juvenile survival studies in conjunction with development of future bypass system alternatives, continue design for relocating sluiceway outfall and for provision of emergency auxiliary water for adult fishways. John Day Dam: Continued testing of extended length (40 ft.) bypass screens for potential replacement of existing 20 ft. screens associated with the existing juvenile bypass system. Initiated Phase I of the John Day drawdown study. 38. COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA along the Columbia River on Bonneville pool, John Day pool, and The Dalles pool. Existing project. Congress has provided authority through public law to implement a wide range of land management, transfer, acquisition and development actions to provide fishing access for Indian tribes who exercise treaty fishing rights on the Columbia River. The law designates certain federal sites on Bonneville, John Day, and The Dalles pools for fishing access. The improvements required at the access sites are specified in the authorizing legislation. They include all weather access roads, camping facilities, boat ramps, docks, sanitation, and fish cleaning facilities. Construction of these facilities will greatly improve access by the four tribes which have fishing rights along this reach of the Columbia River. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Land acquisition and work on plans and specifications for Phase II sites continued. Construction of the second phase sites continued. A total of 16 sites have been completed. 39. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Units is $114,000,000. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March23 and February 4,1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1999 power generation totaled 4.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville PowerAdministration, $26.8 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Location. This project provides for construction of 31 sites 28-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 The addition of water temperature control to the intake tower is authorized. Water temperature control will enhance fish passage and incubation in the McKenzie River. Work on the PreEngineering and Design Phase continued. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of plans and specifications for the intake tower modifications continue. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 178,052,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 177,188,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 28-K. 40. DETROIT LAKE -BIG CLIFF, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 40 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed online June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1999 power generation totaled 22.6 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville PowerAdministration, $80.8 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Refurbished Big Cliff gantry crane. During fiscal year 609,498,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 606,717,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville PowerAdministration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 28-K. 41. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gate-controlled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6,1968. Through September 1999 power generation totaled 11.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville PowerAdministration, $68.1 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Future recreation development at Foster or Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation facilities 28-18 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT at Foster Lake includes 4 parks and 2 parks at Green Peter Lake. Five of these parks were developed by the Corps and are operated by Linn county under lease agreement. One park is operated by the Corps. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Rewind Green Peter Unit 1 and Unit 2 continued. During the fiscal year 278,547,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 276,224,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 28-K. 42. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chutetype spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from Lookout Point. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Through September 1999, power generation totaled 5.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $24.8 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 184,226,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated atproject, of which 183,584,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 43. JOHN DAY LOCKAND DAM -LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acrefeet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 28-N. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete. Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 was completed in FY 1986. Through September 1999 power generation totaled 326.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $465.8 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 5 parks are operated and maintained by local agencies under lease agreement with the Corps. Six developed recreation areas are operated and maintained by the Corps of Engineers. Any future recreation development will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Construction and implementation of the data acquisition control system continued. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 11,727,274,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 11,707,647,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Rehabilitation: Completed fiscal close-out. 44. LOOKOUT POINT- DEXTER LAKES, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of mainstem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. 28-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide-gatecontrolled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000- kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1,2, and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Dexter was placed in operation for reregulation in December 1954. Through September 1999 power generation totaled 17.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $90.5 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All these parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Recreation opportunities are provided at 2 parks on Dexter Lake which are operated by Lane County via the multi-project cost-sharing agreement and lease instruments. The north shore of Lookout Point Lake is also leased to Lane County for recreation purposes; there is essentially no development. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract work to install new exciters at Lookout Point and Dexter initiated. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 436,262,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 433,670,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 45. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On Upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gatecontrolled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility was provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control ofrunoffofdrainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Recreation opportunities are provided by 4 parks at the project. The State of Oregon operates 2 parks, including a 200 unit campground, part of Stewart State Park. Through September 1999, power generation totaled 6.4 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $36.3 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville PowerAdministration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River 28-20 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Cole M. Rivers Fish Hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides full funding for the operation and maintenance of the hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 320,461,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated by the project of which 316,405,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 28-K. 46. THE DALLES LOCKAND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WAAND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially with substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fish-water units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. The total generating capacity is 1,806,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 28-N. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15- 22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks on Lake Celilo. These parks were further expanded with code 710 funds in the late 60's and ea, " 0's. Two parks are operated by Washington State Park Comnussion under a lease agreement. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish LadderAuxiliary Water supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impactthe present operation of the North Fish Ladder. However, it was determined that it was not within the Chief of Engineer's authority to add these power facilities. A local interest, North Wasco County Public Utility District pursued the construction of these power facilities through the FERC license processes and awarded a construction contract in September 1989. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. In October 1996 work began on major rehabilitation of powerhouse units 1-14. Work includes rewind of nine generators, replacement of blades on twelve turbine units, refurbishment of blades on two turbine units, and refurbishment of two bridge cranes. The total cost for major rehabilitation is estimated at $94,000,000 with completion in September 2008. Through September 1999, power generation totaled 299.6 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $427.4 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Further recreation development will require cost sharing and assumption of operation and maintenance by local, non-federal sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: continued work on the data acquisition control system and installation of fish unit exciters. Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 7,898,934,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 7,881,453,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Major Rehabilitation: Completed powerhouse bridge cranes contract, continued rewind of Unit 2 generator, initiated construction of two additional generator rewinds, initiated procurement of 12 additional exciters, initiated preparation of design for five remaining generator rewinds. Work Under Special Authorities 47. PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED A. Continuing Authorities Program (CAP): General Requirements: Individual projects have specific requirements pursuant to the statutes which provide their authorization. In general, however, each project selected must be complete in itself, technically feasible, economically justified, environmentally acceptable, and limited to a federal statutory cost. The local sponsor must agree to provide without cost to the Department of Army, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; provide a cash contribution; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the federal statutory cost limit. Specific requirements by statute for the authorization of each type of CAP project are discussed in detail below. See Table 28-L for expenditures under CAP during the fiscal year. 28-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 645, 86th Congress, as Amended: In addition to the above general requirements, each project selected is limited to a federal statutory cost of not more than $4,000,000. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount, in cash, not less than 10 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost for navigation depending upon the planned depth of channel or basin; pay an additional 10 percent of the construction costs in cash over a period not to exceed 30 years after project completion. The non-federal sponsor must also agree to provide, maintain, and operate an adequate public parking, landing or wharf, service facilities, berthing areas, floats, pier, slips and similar marina and mooring facilities. The remaining portion of the project, such as the access channel or breakwater structure, is maintained by the Corps of Engineers at Federal expense within a limited amount. Federal expenditures for operation and maintenance under the Section 107 authority are administratively limited to the greater of $4,500,000, or 2.25 times the Federal costs of the project including costs for the feasibility through the construction phases. No projects were under construction. Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended: In addition to the above general requirements, each project selected is limited to a federal statutory cost of not more than $7,000,000. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount not less than 35 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; and operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion. One project was under construction as follows: Peninsula Drainage District No. 1, OR: Location. Peninsula Drainage District is located in Portland, Oregon along the Columbia River near river mile 106. Project Description. The Peninsula Drainage District is surrounded by 6.8 miles of levees, flood walls, and railroad and highway embankments. The weak links in the flood protect works are the railroad embankment and the outlet pipe of the pumping plant located on the Columbia Slough levee. The project consists of reinforcing the flood protective system in order to protect against the 100-year reoccurrence frequency flood event. This will be accomplished by reinforcing 2,000 linear feet of the landward side of the railroad embankment at the southwest corner of the drainage district and raising the outlet pipes of the pumping station to above-design flood level of 28.7 feet Portland Datum. The railroad embankment will be reinforced by constructing a sand embankment structure against the landward slope of the railroad embankment having a 12-foot wide crown and 1 vertical to 5 horizontal side slopes. The catch point along a portion of this fill is in a golf course water hazard and the embankment will cover existing golf course tees. As a consequence, a 200 linear foot gabion retaining wall will confine the fill and allow construction of a flat bench so the tees can be re- established. The height of the retaining wall will vary from 2 to 9 feet. The estimated cost for preparation of plans and specifications and construction of the project is $1,484,000, of which $1,113,000 is federal and $371,000 is non-federal. Local cooperation. The Peninsula Drainage District Number 1, Oregon, the non-federal sponsor, signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on July 3, 1997. Operations during fiscal year. The project was modified to address safety issues. A boat barrier was added to preclude access to the outlet. The contract for this task was awarded on Sept 1, 1999 and was physically complete Nov 10, 1999. Emergency Streambank Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as Amended: In addition to the general requirements, each project selected is limited to a federal statutory expenditure of not more than $1,000,000 in any one year. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount not less than 35 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; and operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion. No projects were under construction. B. Modifications to Structures and Operations of Constructed Corps Projects to Improve the Quality of the Environment, Pursuant to Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, as Amended. The Section 1135 program provides the authority for the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to modify existing civil works projects to restore the environment. A non-federal entity is required to sponsor the project. The project must accomplish restoration by modifying a Corps project or operation of a Corps project, or be located on Corps project lands. The project must be feasible and consistent with the authorized purpose. The non-federal sponsor generally must assume responsibility of the operation and maintenance associated with the project. Planning studies, detailed design, and construction costs are shared by the Corps 75 percent and non-federal sponsor 25 percent. Total project costs cannot exceed $6.7 million with the federal share limited to $5,000,000 without specific congressional authorization. See Table 28-L for expenditures under Section 1135 during the fiscal year. Two projects are under construction as follows: Fern Ridge Marsh, OR Location: This project modification is located at the Fern Ridge Lake project on the Long Tom River, a Tributary of the 28-22 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Willamette River approximately 6 miles west of Eugene, Oregon. Project Description: The Fern Ridge Marsh Restoration Project entails marsh restoration and management actions on 347 acres in the western portion of the Fisher Butte Management Unit (West Fisher Butte sub-unit) at Fern Ridge Lake Project. The restoration will restore and provide for management of 347 acres of marsh habitat via construction of 7 water control structures, 15,900 lineal feet of dikes and rock dikes (carp excluders) within the drawdown zone of Fern Ridge Lake Project. The general intent of the proposed action is the restoration of a more diverse and productive marsh plant and wildlife community in areas currently dominated by reed canarygrass. This species is an exotic plant found in extensive stands in shallow water areas around the reservoir perimeter. The total project cost, including lands, is estimated at approximately $540,000. Local Cooperation: The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife signed a local cooperation agreement for the project on July 19, 1999. Operations During fiscal Year: Construction was initiated in August 1999. The material for the dikes was placed in rough sections. Due to adverse weather conditions, construction was halted prior to completion of the project and will be resumed in the Fall of 2000. Lower Amazon Creek Wetlands Restoration Location: This project modification is located along Amazon Creek at the western edge of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Amazon Creek is a major drainage channel for Eugene, conveying flows into the Long Tom River, a tributary of the Willamette River. Project Description: Prior to settlement in the 1850's, seasonal wet prairie habitat dominated the landscape of the lower Amazon Creek basin and much of the Willamette Valley. Since then, nearly all of this wetland type has been lost to agriculture and urban uses. The Amazon Creek Flood control Project built by the Corps in the 1950's further degraded the wetland hydrology when the creek and connecting drainages were channelized and lined with levees. It is estimated that less than one percent of the Willamette Valley's historic wet prairies remains today. The lower Amazon Creek Wetlands Project will restore the historic hydrology and vegetation community to almost 400 acres of wet prairie. All of the land within the project area is owned by the City of Eugene and BLM, having been acquired for wetland protection and restoration purposes. The total project cost, including lands, is estimated at approximately $4.2 million. Local Cooperation: The City of Eugene signed a local cooperation agreement for the project on October 26, 1998. The project is also supported by the Bureau of Land Management under it's West Eugene Wetlands Project. Operations During fiscal Year: Phases I and II were initiated in July and completed in November 1999. Phase I involved removing existing levees along Amazon Creek and associated drainages and restoring the channels more natural meandering stream configurations.. New levees were set back around the margin of the wetland restoration area to maintain the flood control function of the project. Interior wetland areas will now be subject to the high frequency flooding that occurred prior the flood control project. The new levees were seeded with a combination of native upland grass species. A slotted weir was constructed to maintain the complex flow relationship between the connected channels. Culverts, some gated, were also installed to maintain drainage and to allow manipulation of surface hydrology for wetland management purposes. In Phase II, disturbed areas along the stream channels and the old levee footprints were seeded and planted with native wet prairie, emergent marsh and vernal pool species. The total cost for these phases was approximately $1.5 million. Construction will continue with Phase III in FY 2000 and 2001. Phase III will involve removal of non-native plant materials throughout the entire project area and replacement with native wet prairie plants. A major portion of this effort will be propagation of native plants and seeds. Phase II will also include modification of surface hydrology. 48. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES PROGRAM Disaster Preparedness Program. This program encompasses all the activities associated with preparedness (including publication of plans and policy documents), exercises, training, coordination with outside agencies and governments, maintaining supplies and equipment, and the like. Significant activities included a briefing to all employees on district's Earthquake Response Plan, and an emergency communications exercise for branch chiefs. This exercise included hands-on radio training, and an exercise conducted at assembly areas, which required the setup and operation of HF/ SSB radios. Public law 84-99. FY 1998 was a relatively quiet flood year, with no significant flood response activities. The district accomplished one post-flood activity on the Millicoma River in Coos County, to remove a logjam that threatened a highway bridge. Continuing Eligibility Inspections. The district completed all scheduled annual inspections of flood control works. As part of these inspections, sector engineers discussed and gave advice to local sponsors regarding their local flood plans and application of Public Law 84-99 as it pertains to them. Catastrophic Disaster Response Planning. This initiative was begun in FY98. It requires that a comprehensive set of Operations Plans be developed to cope with a subduction earthquake off the Oregon/Washington coast in the Richter range of 8 to 8.5. The district has begun planning for this event in coordination with several other Corps commands. See Table 28-M for expenditures during the fiscal year. 28-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 General Investigations 49. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,648,050 of which $402,870 was for navigation studies, $151 for flood damage prevention studies, $385,042 for Special Studies, $164,724 for comprehensive studies, $549,182 for miscellaneous activities, and $146,081 for coordination with other agencies. Contributed funds in the amount of $601,406 were expended of which $36,432 was contributed by the Association of Lower Columbia River Ports for the Columbia River Channel Deepening Study, $94,354 was contributed by the State of Oregon for the Willamette River Basin Review study, $104,414 was contributed by the City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services for the Columbia Slough Ecosystem Restoration Study, $4,359 was contributed by the Tillamook Soil and Water Conservation District for the Tillamook Ecosystem Restoration Study, and $32,848 was contributed for the Planning Assistance to States Program. 50. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, floodwater velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Fiscal year costs totaling $220,172 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program: FPMS Unit $40,502; Technical Services $43,175; Quick Responses $6,904; National Flood Proof Committee $7,415; and special studies $122,176. 51. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Willamette River Temperature Control, OR The project plan consists of improving downstream water temperatures by modifying the existing intake towers at Cougar and Blue River projects. Restoring pre-project temperatures will improve survival rates and increase populations of three important native fish species: the wild stock of Willamette spring chinook salmon, the bull trout, and the rainbow trout. These fisheries once provided important recreational and commercial benefits to the region. Preconstruction engineering and design is estimated to cost $4,596,000 and be completed by March 2000. The construction phase is estimated to cost approximately $70.6 million. Continued design and geotechnical explorations work in support of the intake tower modifications. Fiscal year expenditures were $1,205,203. Columbia River Channel Improvements Study, OR & WA The project plan consists of deepening a segment of the Columbia and Willamette Rivers by 3 feet to 43 feet. The project area begins at the mouth of the Columbia River and extends upstream to the vicinity of the Port of Vancouver, Washington (approximately river mile 105), and also includes the Lower Willamette River from its confluence with the Columbia River (river mile 101.5) upstream to the vicinity of downtown Portland (approximately river mile 11). Project cost sharing will include requirements for non-Federal interests to pay 25 percent of the project cost during construction, and an additional 10 percent to be repaid over a period not exceeding 30 years. Cost of construction is estimated at $188,319,000. Fiscal year expenditures were $10,000. 28-24 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 to In Text Sep.30, 1999 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (Federal Funds) (Inland Waterway Trust Fund) 2. Chetco River, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver,WA and The Dalles, OR 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR 9. Coos Bay, OR (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 275,000 250,000 17,500 265,846 459,423 34,063 3,000 175,449,807 50 7,985 175,438,370 50 275,000 250,000 17,500 4,693,885 180,140,385 265,846 353,704 30,558 4,700,058 180,126,632 2,043,713 ' 2,043,713 350,000 400,000 426,000 443,000 463,980 393,612 432,929 443,781 10,240,673 10,240,137 28,349,304 2 28,349,304 2 17,039,000 22,278,000 14,280,550 16,136,000 406,538,846 3 17,041,834 20,387,161 14,105,152 18.209,097 406,514,942 3 665,954 4 665,954 4 941,252 941,252 6,000 14,000 1,599 17,973 882,000 13,000 1,037,172 12,526 4,000 14,000 4,646 13,784 4,000 286,000 7,733 285,994 4,674,087 4,673,741 220,283 5 220,283 5 7,910,877 7,910,126 24,913,661 6 24,913,661 6 6,651,000 2,880,000 6,325,000 6,361,500 166,202,353 7 6,661,664 3,006,465 6,307,009 6,381,320 166,201,959 7 7,322,878 7,322,878 5,989,509 8 5,989,509 S 247,000 636,000 657,000 290,000 249,834 635,048 657,103 290,041 15,195,359 9 15,193,436 9 150,000 52,024 2,860,000 4,407,000 849,000 2,810,065 4,413,093 24,288 868,554 37,866,092 10 37,866,092 10 28-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (CONTINUED) See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 to In Text Sep.30, 1999 (Contributed Funds) 10. Coquille River, OR 11. Depoe Bay, OR 12. Port Orford, OR 14. Rogue River Harbor At Gold Beach, OR 15. Siuslaw River, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Skipanon Channel, OR Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,545,000 3,006,000 3,181,000 5,678,200 2,635,306 3,018,236 3,182,478 5,666,808 1,133,000 1,730,000 637,000 1,131,911 1,724,174 47,439 471,853 154,000 329,000 127,000 224,000 160,933 325,948 130,912 224,184 43,000 39,365 3,000 32,000 10,000 10,925 30,512 12,741 495,000 411,000 509,000 767,000 465,941 439,767 511,626 768,999 1,007,000 898,000 1,072,000 87,000 998,183 909,712 993,486 165,547 420,000 198,000 283,000 262,000 394,964 230,940 279,350 267,734 41,000 132,000 189,000 159,000 15,893 158,565 189,237 159,623 114,588,918 "1 114,572,905 " 2,335,966 2,335,966 3,986,680 3,862,057 693,366 12 693,366 12 8,954,987 13 8,954,875 13 367,364 367,364 1,757,717 1,757,241 758,692 14 758,692 14 7,181,217 7,178,715 4,156,252 15 4,156,252 15 19,286,394 16 19,278,254 16 635,783 635,783 29,502,212 17 29,502,212 17 17,262,384 18 17,262,339 18 879,285 879,285 493,611 493,611 280,854 280,854 4,143,064 4,142,845 28-26 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (CONTINUED) See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 to In Text Sep.30, 1999 17. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR 18. Umpqua River, OR 19. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 20. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 21. Yaquina River, OR 22. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin OR 23. Blue River Lake, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Costl Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13,000 7,209 3,000 4,981 5,000 21,000 8,807 21,804 714,000 436,000 1,392,000 977,000 707,807 443,911 1,393,683 976,853 1,303,000 786,000 690,000 487,200 1,242,935 696,184 865,491 498,267 1,688,000 2,487,000 2,268,000 6,410,000 1,725,476 2,499,188 2,259,405 6,420,500 481,000 -278,000 -67,000 328,104 -118,579 -65,116 583,000 837,000 769,000 807,000 601,219 835,902 755,008 818,099 240,000 230,000 251,000 215,000 224,466 250,095 246,491 220,207 28-27 22,434,827 19 22,434,827 19 6,806,082 20 6,805,462 20 2,839,799 2,839,799 17,718,877 21 17,718,877 21 34,605,093 34,649,542 2,500,677 2,500,677 520,005 22 520,005 22 24,340,018 23 24,335,262 23 234,794 234,794 19,242,046 24 19,242,046 24 50,581,758 25 50,580,671 25 12,005 12,005 28,800 28,800 --- 1,463,694 51 --- 1,462,781 51 91,642,489 91,642,489 10,331,115 48 10,321,530 48 32,038,225 26 32,038,225 26 4,678,299 53 4,667,912 53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (CONTINUED) See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 to In Text Sep.30, 1999 24. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 25. Dorena Lake, OR 26. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 27. Fall Creek Lake, OR 28. Fern Ridge Lake, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 30. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR & WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 31. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 32. Scappoose Drainage District, OR 34. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp Cost 691,000 931,000 696,000 819,000 667,752 954,616 680,606 828,078 425,000 458,000 935,000 653,000 416,996 482,749 893,215 700,441 700,000 473,000 987,398 1,203,214 74,000 302,000 887,209 495,882 507,000 583,000 1,175,000 432,000 496,088 601,053 1,131,573 467,066 1,024,000 1,324,000 1,210,000 807,700 1,012,831 1,343,905 1,165,721 856,142 50,000 130,000 -10,000 32,203 111,318 28,260 10,200 0 3,650 0 0 25,000 34,000 300,000 -310 10,160 57,549 243,182 515,000 1,364,000 308,000 281,100 478,952 1,390,176 311,026 304,912 161,000 2,517 86,000 30,000 80,337 18,600 0 -29,000 116,030 11,382 -10,000 7,227 2,790 257,000 805,000 181,000 355,000 176,742 881,075 198,469 351,834 28-28 4,013,123 27 4,013,123 27 17,079,288 28 17,057,873 28 14,568,262 29 14,568,262 29 11,459,460 11,447,662 109,399,579 109,269,766 22,118,264 30 22,118,264 30 10,973,671 10,960,111 8,685,635 31 8,685,635 31 23,491,898 32 23,481,822 32 52,666 52,666 21,202,745 21,192,244 10,200 0 112,028,000 111,970,041 3,703,112 3,703,112 4,273,100 4,272,572 4,123,558 4,121,487 24,971,816 33 24,971,325 "3 5,698,709 5,695,377 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (CONTINUED) See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 to In Text Sep.30, 1999 35. Willow Creek Lake, OR 36. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville OR and WA 37. Columbia River Fish Mitigation, OR and WA 38. Columbia River Treaty Fishing Access Sites, OR & WA 39. Cougar Lake, OR 40. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR 41. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR 42. Hills Creek Lake, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 563,000 528,000 530,000 555,000 552,081 536,019 512,150 581,009 37,260,114 37,260,114 7,409,051 7,402,446 25,000 718,000 70,000 32,396 789,837,000 34 400,129 676,103 96,720 50,475 789,827,369 34 18,889,000 15,894,000 16,114,000 16,604,100 315,955,763 35 19,131,888 15,966,594 15,637,786 17,009,763 315,622,296 35 7,299,000 7,140,000 10,960,000 13,238,604 8,125,408 6,944,705 11,092,955 12,870,401 60,289,604 59,753,184 21,536,000 47,391,000 57,719,000 58,749,000 224,445,000 52 22,663,087 44,279,324 58,545,415 49,673,014 212,678,596 52 2,970,000 2,729,000 7,460,079 7,774,442 4,664,175 2,538,734 6,520,182 8,797,936 1,142,000 1,443,000 1,272,000 1,366,200 1,134,127 1,456,129 1,217,890 1,416,843 2,293,000 2,107,000 2,537,000 2,538,200 1,989,106 2,410,295 2,406,655 2,660,104 2,398,000 2,828,000 2,683,000 2,929,600 2,405,634 2,823,012 2,643,533 2,953,897 678,000 668,000 743,000 901,900 676,849 672,351 728,183 914,229 23,700,521 23,229,027 58,636,393 36 58,636,393 36 23,773,396 49 23,742,283 49 62,729,698 62,729,698 48,348,807 47 48,304,304 47 363,086 363,086 84,005,788 37 84,005,788 "7 49,763,303 38 49,714,148 38 45,700,619 45,700,619 15,748,275 39 15,742,166 39 28-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (CONTINUED) See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 to In Text Sep.30, 1999 43. John Day Lock and New Work Dam - Lake Umatilla, Approp. 512,400,246 40 OR and WA Cost 0 512,400,246 40 Maint. Approp. 11,881,000 11,850,000 12,427,000 13,386,500 233,284,227 41 Cost 12,202,888 12,122,437 12,196,731 13,530,020 233,110,089 41 Major Rehab. Approp. 2,534,000 1,591,000 0 --- 44,005,128 54 Cost 2,551,108 720,230 889,761 4,463 44,005,128 54 44. Lookout Point - Dexter New Work Lakes, OR Approp. 88,238,395 42 Cost 88,238,395 42 Maint. Approp. 6,274,000 6,109,000 4,663,000 4,402,500 87,312,032 43 Cost 5,881,268 5,593,477 5,257,357 4,747,792 87,246,159 43 45. Lost Creek Lake, New Work Rogue River Approp. 136,408,150 Basin, OR Cost 136,408,150 Maint Approp. 3,876,000 3,831,000 3,988,000 3,910,300 60,225,918 44 Cost 3,865,540 3,864,327 3,820,931 4,050,722 60,176,156 44 46. The Dalles Lock and New Work Dam - Lake Celilo, Approp. 303,260,288 45 WA and OR Cost 303,260,288 45 Maint. Approp. 12,865,000 11,820,000 11,728,000 12,323,000 213,651,670 46 Cost 12,243,654 12,609,899 11,614,994 12,508,235 213,567,179 46 Major Rehab. Approp. 1,893,000 4,637,000 5,560,000 12,090,000 Cost 1,741,337 4,297,713 5,741,481 11,780,531 1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project.Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, OR (not part of regular project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 8. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393. Entrance to Oregon slough; $161,897, Camas-Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908, Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470, Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9. Includes $2,033,408 under code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 10. Includes $802,096 for previous project, Excludes contributed funds. 11.Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 12. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. includes $36,000 under Code 711. 13. Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 14. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 16. Includes $21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. 17. Includes $1,159,357 for previous project. 18. Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 19. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 20. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 21. Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 22. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 23. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 24. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 28-30 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 25. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 26. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 27. Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 28. Includes $167,878 special recreation use fees. Includes $79,818 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 29. Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 30. Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 31. Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 32. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 33. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 34. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recover Act Funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $136,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $6,000 power units funds. 35. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 36. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 37. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 38. Includes $983,934 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 39. Includes $82,408 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 40. Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 41. Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 42. Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 43. Includes $991,562 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 44. Includes $978,478 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 45. Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15 - 22 funds. 46. Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 47. Includes $936,376 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 48. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 49. Includes $861,852 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 50. Includes $24,307 under code 422 General Investigation. 51. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 52. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 53. Includes $5,694 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 54. Excludes 96-89X4045 funds. 28-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Aug 15, 1985 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 02 , 1945 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 04, 1981 Oct 31, 1992 Feb 27, 1911 Jul 25, 1912 Jul 27, 1916 Aug 08, 1917 Sep 22, 1922 Mar 04, 19232 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 03, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Construction of a new navigation lock just south P.L. 99-88 of existing lock. Construction to be funded 50% from fuel taxes paid P.L. 99-662 into Inland Waterways Trust Fund. CHETCO RIVER, OR To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. Assume responsibility for O&M of the approximately 200-foot-long access channel to the south commercial boat basin consistent with authorized project depths. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. Increasing main channel to 30 feet. Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, WA. Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. Sep 06, 19331 A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. Aug 30, 1935 A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Aug 30, 1935 Maintenance of not to exceed 35 foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Aug 30, 1935 Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Aug 26, 1937 Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 1,000 feet downstream. Aug 26, 1937 An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Mar 02, 1945 Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. Mar 02, 1945 An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. Jul 24, 1946 A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. Oct 23, 1962 A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2turning basins of same depth. Oct 23, 1962 A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. Aug 17, 1999 Deepen the existing navigation channel by three feet. H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' No Prior Report H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess.' H. Doc. 630. 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong.,2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' P.L. 106-53 28-32 2. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (CONTINUED) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA East Channel Main channel West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Channel 8 feet deep. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50,75th Cong., 2d Sess. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong.,lst Sess.' COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore.' Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel cross section to 55 feet. Lower a 500' section of south jetty at river mile 7. Dec 11, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 02, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jun 20, 1938 Sep 03, 1954 Mar 03, 1905 Dec 22, 1944 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 30, 1983 May 24, 1995 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Nov 5, 1990 COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from H. Committee Doc. 94, Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.' by 800 feet long. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a P. L. 101-514; H. R. 101-889, 101st support structure to serve as the foundation for the Cong, 2d Sess. Seafarer's Memorial in the Columbia River, in cooperation with the City of Hammond, Oregon. COOS BAY, OR Jun 25, 1910 Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. Mar 02, 1919 A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. Sep 22, 1922 Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Jan 21, 1927 Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. Jul 03, 1930 A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. Aug 30, 1935 For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Jul 24, 1946 Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. Jun 30, 1948 A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Dec 31, 1970 Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. Nov 13, 1995 Deepening the authorized channel by 2 feet and expanding one turningbasin. The entrance would be 47 feet deep to River Mile (RM) 1 and the inner channel 37 feet between RM 1 and 15. H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong.,lst Sess. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 646, 80th Cong.,2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 104-46 28-33 H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' P.L. 98-63 Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662, as amended 5. 7. 8. 9. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (CONTINUED) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 02, 1945 COQUILLE RIVER, OR Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. DEPOE BAY, OR Aug 26, 1937 Construction of an inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with an entrance channel of same depth and 30 feet wide. Mar 2, 1945 Construction of an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 feet wide. July 14, 1960 Construction of entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, concrete breakwater and stone spending beach. Oct 27, 1965 Dec 31, 1970 Oct 31, 1992 Sep 03, 1954 PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep. Maintain the authorized navigation channel including those portions of the channel within 50 feet of the port facility. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Sep 19, 1890 Build two high-tide stone jetties. Jun 25, 1910 Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot south jetty. Mar 03, 1925 12-foot deep channel. Jul 03, 1958 Oct 22, 1976 Oct 01, 1980 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 26, 1937 Jun 30, 1948 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of north Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 2,500 feet, respectively. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge, 30 feet deep. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Jul 26, 1912 Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging Mar 04, 1913 channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Mar 02, 1919 Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. Mar 03, 1925 Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Mar 02, 1945 Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula caused by storm Jan. 1939. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 207, 65th Cong.,lst Sess.' H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Food Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 107 of R&H Act 1960, approved Feb. 1965. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong.,2d Sess H. Doc 151, 91st Cong.,2d Sess. P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong.,lst Sess.' Final Report of Chief of Engineers P.L. 96-367 H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 93, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.4 28-34 10. 11. 12. 14. 15. 16. 17. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (CONTINUED) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 27, 1965 Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. Construct South Jetty, 8,000 feet long. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Sep 22, 1922 North Jetty, 7,500 feet long Jan 21, 1927 Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging ocean bar. Jul 03, 1930 A short south jetty Aug 30, 1935 A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging to a 26-foot depth. Jun 20, 1938 Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth to Reedsport. Mar 02, 1945 Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Mar 02, 1945 Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Jun 30, 1948 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Sep 03, 1954 Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River. 5 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 08, 1917 Jun 26, 19346 Mar 02, 19458 WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Mar 02, 1919 Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Aug 26, 1937 Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 03, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Mar 4, 1913 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, as far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Construction of channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depot Creek. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Oct 23, 1962 Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Mar 07, 1974 Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. Authorizes Construction of hydroelectric power facilities COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. 18. 28-35 H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9,72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong.,3d Sess.' S. Doc. 86,76th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, P. 4374 H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 Doc. 579, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 93-251 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 99-662 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (CONTINUED) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents DORENA LAKE, OR Jun 28, 1938 Earthfill dam. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Oct 23, 1962 Oct 07, 1970 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 4, 1993 May 17, 1950 ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Roller compacted concrete dam. Authorized construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Earthfill embankment dam Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. Construction of waterfowl impoundments. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, Provides bank protection on Columbia River below river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Aug 15, 1985 Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. Jun 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 Jun 22, 1936 Jun 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct 27, 1965 SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Construction of levee system. Raising and strengthening levee. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong.,2d Sess. P.L. 91-439 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc 403, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. Sec 1135, P.L.99-662 as amended OR AND WA H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 99-88 F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong.,2d Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong.,2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergengy Administration of Public Works. Aug 30, 1935 Existing project authorized by Congress. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug 21, 1933) Aug 20, 1937 Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions herein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended Mar 07, 1974 Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville P.L. 93-251 to new towri site. Aug 22, 1984 Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area. P.L. 98-396 Oct 1992 Authorizes transfer of lands to town of North Bonneville. P.L. 102-396, Sec. 9147 COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR and WA Jul 19, 1988 Design, test, and construct fish bypass facilities. P. L. 100-371 Nov 1, 1988 Oct 12, 1996 COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA Authorizes project for mitigation of lost treaty fishing Title IV of P.L. 100-581 access resulting from construction of Bonneville Dam. Boundary adjustments. P.L. 104-303, Sec. 512 28-36 25. 26. 27. 28. 30. 31. 32. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (CONTINUED) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents COUGAR LAKE, OR Rockfill dam. Addition of power Strube Lake reregulating dam. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure. Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam with power. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Authorized Green Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). Addition of power at Green Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780. P.L. 87-874 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. P.L. 858, 80th Cong.2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780, E C. Act 1954 S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 39. 40. 41. May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 Jun 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 24, 1965 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 Sep 21, 1962 Oct 15, 1966 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 12, 1996 Aug 17, 1999 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 89-689, Public Works Approp. Act, 1967 THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities. as amended WILLAMETE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR Authorized modifications to intake towers to benefit fish habitat. Increased authorized cost. P.L. 104-303 P.L. 106-53 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3. Public Works Administration 4. Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 5. Inactive. 6. Permanent appropriations Repeal Act. 7. Flood Control Act 8. Classified Deferred. 9. Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 28-37 LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Earth-and-gravel filled dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake as reregulating dam. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. Authorizes construction of project but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. 42. 43. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities. as amended John Day waterfowl management area. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 44. 45. 46. 51. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alsea River, OR AstoriaTurning Basin, OR' Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR' Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA' Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR' Clatskanie River, OR2 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA' Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR Cowlitz River, WA Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR' Deep River, WA2 Depoe Bay, OR' Elochoman Slough, WA2 Grays River, WA2 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR' Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge(Barge Channel), OR' Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA' Lake River, WA Lewis River, WA Long Tom River, OR Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Multnomah Channel, OR2 Nehalem Bay, OR Nestucca River, OR Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR2 Salmon River, OR2 Smith River, OR2 Skamokawa Creek, WA South Channel, Government Island, OR' South Slough (Charleston), OR' The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR' 2 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, OR and WA' 3 Tongue Point, OR' Umatilla Harbor, OR' 4 Westport Slough, OR2 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, OR' Yaquina River, OR' Youngs and Claskanie River, OR Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR2 7.5 MCY Standby Time 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 107). 2. Channel adequate for present commerce. 3. Includes $15,537 for previous project 4. Includes $23,489 for previous project. 5. Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. 6. Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. 7. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 8. Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 9. Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. 10. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $102,000 contributed funds. 12. Project abondoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 13. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 14. Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 15. Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds 17. Excludes $86,586 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds; includes $8,000 for previous project. 19. Excludes $1,776,008 contributed funds. 28-38 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Abandoned Completed Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1985 1944 1971 1985 1969 1986 1991 1985 1975 1963 1971 1990 1941 1977 1961 1963 1986 1983 1985 1982 1987 1963 1949 1974 1991 1985 1970 1939 1957 1992 1952 1966 1985 1985 1979 1971 1979 1996 2,000 870,139 1,173,524 1,081,806 171,467 1,197,300 19,2403 1,589,231 350,238 18 277,436 6 329,423 15,384 145,588 5 18,641 '17 2,500 519,090 7 1,154,162 8 15,281 302,000 2,700 58,132 437,669 302,006 '10 16,881 2,145 143,120 2,400 119,800 " 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 2,807,876 '" 16,276 862,918 1,616,369 891,695 '5 195,313 16 2,000 9,348 26,237 16,648 194,896 4 2,152,914 1,474,036 32,768 196,864 35,670 58,127 685,677 4,000 25,000 55,195 6,000 90,514 205,130 436,185 559,858 2,833,888 171,909 17,900,293 34,449 4,314,000 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 163,397 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1941 163,291 Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1942 69,724 Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Completed 1943 574,123 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 161,381 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1941 258,795 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County WA Completed 1941 26,810 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR Completed 1951 169,542 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 240,939 John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 33,080 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1941 25,773 Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 18,789 Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 158,419 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1961 91,652 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 61,186 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 39,475 Midland Drainage District Columbia County, OR Completed 1939 77,774 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1951 593,034 4 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1942 241,148 Port of Kalama, WA' Completed 99,844 Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1942 47,662 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1951 1,623,505 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1946 178,885 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA Completed 1985 5,289,833 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 133,778 Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed 1947 61,263 State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA' Completed 1985 504,642 " Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932 Warrenton Diking District, 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596 Webb District Improvement Co.,Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1,WA Completed 1939 42,978 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA' Completed 1985 250,000 Mt. St. Helens and Vicinity, WA Completed 1995 42,036,000 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,131,944 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA' Completed 236,860 Hayden Island, OR Inactive Midland Drainage District, OR Completed 1971 304,511 28-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (CONTINUED) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Rainier Drainage District, OR Sandy Drainage District, OR Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Vancouver Lake Area, WA Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR Woodson Drainage District, OR WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Mill Creek, Salem, OR Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR' Whelton Ditch, OR ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR7 Bear Creek, Medford, OR' Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR' Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR' Deschutes River, Bend, OR2 John Day River (West), OR' Johnson Creek, OR McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR' McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Miami River, OR' Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR 2 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR' Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR' Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR9 (a) Riverside Area Units (b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR9 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 Rogue River, OR' Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA' Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR' Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR' Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Sumner Parker Airport, OR' Trask River, Tillamook County, OR' Tualatin, OR Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR' Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR' Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR West Makinster Rd., Wilson River, OR' Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR' 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 3. Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act Funds 4. Excludes $25,000 contributed funds 5. Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs project constructed by local interests. 6. Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 7. Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L. 80-85. See FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887 8. Excludes $2,520 contributed funds 9. Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974 10. Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 Government furnished sheet steel pile. 11. Includes $254,642 contributed funds. 12. Includes $185,000 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $5,822 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $31,031 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $98,313 contributed funds. 28-40 Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1964 1961 1967 1954 1966 1981 1971 1973 1964 1960 1993 1967 1950 1967 1957 1959 1952 1982 1988 1986 1981 1985 1966 1948 1955 1952 1960 1959 1960 1939 1971 1960 1985 1994 1961 1984 1985 1985 1952 1952 1986 1,499,186 35,265 593,945 154,012 674,137 889,391 48,619 1,803,488 162,500 1,214,300 6 175,800 14 276,700 39,624 23,439 23,050 106,198 104,921 182,655 42,761 70,845 8 1,307,216 22,963 106,250 ' 127,800 170,245 29,500 148,358 15,321 118,433 55,007 55,189 11,690 16,000 9,100 267,748 161,540 143,263 968,716 'o 86,230 288,447 435,000 12 365,000 '5 215,939 176,351 92,500 121,273 1,803,094 33,835 154,600 428,881 45,677 176,000 30,000 - - PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1999 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds Completed 1969 185,000 Bonneville, OR Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Inactive 1994 5,799,926 Dredging, OR & WA TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR 1977 Bachelor Island, WA 1977 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 11,595 Cascadia Lake, OR 1987 954,114 1 Chetco River, OR 1997 235,353 Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 4,472 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR 1978 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR 1987 Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 21,352 Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR 1977 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1960 1970 6,819 Deer Island Drainage District, OR 1987 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 Ferguson Creek Long Tom River, Or 1978 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1977 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR 1977 Gate Creek Lake, OR 1987 745,001 2 Holley Lake, OR 1963 1987 241,992 3 John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 John Day River, OR 1974 1974 210,220 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 Lake River Delta Area, WA 1977 Lewis River Area, WA 1978 Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR 1977 Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR 1987 9,000 Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, Or 1967 1987 39,624 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 Soap Creek, WA 1977 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR 1978 Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24,145 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR 1987 4,000 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR 1958 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056 28-41 1. Excludes Pro-rata share of $112,000 for Sweet Home Reservoir. 3. Excludes $100,000 preauthorization study costs. 2. Excludes Pro-rata share of $95 000 for Quartz Creek Reservoir REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (CONTINUED) For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 Wiley Creek Lake, OR 1960 112,000 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portions) 1987 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR 1961 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 1948 1987 142,883 TABLE 28-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1999 (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 28,349,304 406,514,942 434,864,246 Public Works 446,296 14,414 460,710 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 28,934,049 406,628,024 435,562,073 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 442,928 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 29,600,003 406,652,344 436,525,347 TABLE 28-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 13 OF TEXT) Project Date Survey Conducted Baker Bay, WA Jun 1999 Depoe Bay, OR May 1999 Tillamook, OR Sep 1999 Hood River Boat Basin, OR Feb 1999 Chinook, WA Apr 1999 Siuslaw River - Florence to Mapleton, OR Jun 1999 Willameette River - Ross Island to Oregon City, OR Jun 1999 TABLE 28-J WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (SEE SECTION 19 OF TEXT) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet' Lift of each lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22,5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet2 Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price $375,000 28-42 1. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states of water, directly from basin and supplied water for powerplants operated by Crown is at upper end of canal basin. Zellerbach Corp., and Portland Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being 2. A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 to Guard operated by Portland General Electric Co. Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, which formerly led 3. The dam is owned by private parties. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-K FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Date of Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Peak Inflow Cu. FtJSec. Acre/feet 22. Applegate Lake, OR November 21, 1998 4,636 5,713 23. Blue River Lake, OR December 28, 1998 9,849 32,260 24. Cottage Grove Lake, OR December 28, 1998 4,251 10,449 39. Cougar Lake, OR December 28, 1998 9,877 29,820 40. Detroit Lake, OR December 28, 1998 26,089 126,520 25. Dorena Lake, OR December 28, 1998 12,401 31,756 27. Fall Creek Lake, OR December 28, 1998 9,900 26,988 28. Fern Ridge Lake, OR December 28, 1998 10,023 43,949 41. Foster Lake, OR December 28, 1998 16,640 13,174 41. Green Peter Lake, OR December 28, 1998 31,570 123,605 42. Hills Creek Lake, OR November 21, 1998 13,470 43,860 44. Lookout Point Lake, OR December 28, 1998 23,300 82,586 45. Lost Creek Lake, OR November 21, 1998 7,790 11,705 28-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-L WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED (SEE SECTION 47 OF TEXT) Fiscal Year Costs Project Status' Federal Non-Federal Total Beach Erosion Control Projects Pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 874, 87th Congress, As Amended Rock Creek, Hwy 101 F 4,508 - 4,508 US 101, Beverly Beach, OR F 85,172 - 85,172 Total Section 103 89,680 - 89,680 Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 645, 86th Congress, as Amended Newport, OR X -2,192 2,279 87 Port of Brookings (Chetco), OR F 9,117 - 9,117 Port of Morrow, OR F 70,447 68,953 139,400 Coordination 7,412 - 7,412 Total Section 107 84,784 71,232 156,016 Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended Keizer, OR F 80,999 73,064 154,063 Klickitat, WA F 13,081 - 13,081 Lewis County, WA F 19,580 - 19,580 Lewis River, Woodland, WA F 13,922 - 13,922 Little Pudding River, Marion County, OR F 4,576 - 4,576 Mill Creek, The Dalles, OR F 17,173 - 17,173 Peninsula Drainage District #1, OR P/C 116,214 130,704 246,918 Salem, OR F 192,406 45,570 237,976 Scio, OR F 19,828 - 19,828 Siuslaw River, Mapleton, OR F 9,971 - 9,971 Coordination 13,962 - 13,962 Total Section 205 501,712 249,338 751,050 Emergency Streambank Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended Coordination 13,732 13,732 Total Section 14 13,732 - 13,732 Project Modifications for Improvement of the Environment Pursuant to Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, as Amended Amazon Creek Wetlands, OR C 1,600,967 - 1,600,967 Coos Bay Western Snowy Plover, OR X 1,898 -871 1,027 Fern Ridge Lake Marsh Restoration, OR C 145,359 - 154,359 Fox Creek, OR D 18,766 - 18,766 Lower Columbia Slough, OR F 1,536 - 1,536 Richardson Park, OR D 44,251 - 44,251 Trestle Bay, OR X -1,250 62 -1,188 Willamette Mission State Park, OR F 41,860 - 41,860 Initial Appraisals 8,545 - 8,545 Coordination 7,946 - 7,946 Total Section 1135 1,869,878 -809 1,869,069 28-44 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Project Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Pursuant to Section 206 of the 1996 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 303,104th Congress, as amended Bowers Rock State Park, OR Clatskanie River, OR Trout Creek, OR Upper Rogue Habitat Protection & Restoration, OR Preliminary Restoration Plans Coordination Total Section 206 Disaster Preparedness Program (Category 100) Planning Training and Exercise Facilities National Center for Expertise Total Disaster Preparedness Program Emergency Operations (Category 200) Response Operations Post Flood Response Acquisition of Supplies/Equip Operational Deployment Total Emergency Operations Rehabilitation (Category 300) Federal Flood Control Works Non-Federal Flood Control Works Field Investigations Inspections Interagency Levee Activities Total Rehabilitation Advance Measures Advance Measure Assistance Field Investigations Total Advance Measures Reimbursement Activity Other Agencies Other Corps Offices Total Reimbursement Activity Status' Federal Non-Fe F DF 19,296 55,754 16,879 69,698 54,791 7,485 223,903 293,230 18,553 42,134 290 354,207 116,618 4,899 121,517 122,886 00 19,112 6,116 148,114 47,425 19,674 67,099 863,808 886633,,880088 aderal 0000 0 0000 31,276 0000 31,276 00 0 00 0 28-45 WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED (SEE SECTION 47 OF TEXT) Fiscal Year Costs 19,296 55,754 16,879 69,698 54,791 7,485 223,903 TABLE 28-L (CONTINUED) Total 1/ Status: C = Construction; D = Planning and Design Analysis; F = Feasibility; P = Plans and Specifications; X=Fiscal Close Out TABLE 28-M FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES (SEE SECTION 48 OF TEXT) Appropriation Contributed 96X3125 Funds I -, , - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam OR and WA -- Lake Bonneville (See Section 36 of Text) John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA -- Lake Umatilla (See Section 43 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK (NEW) Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Open to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Elevation(Normal)(Above Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length (First Powerhouse) Length (Second Powerhouse) Width (First Powerhouse) Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) (First Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock)(Second Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators (First Powerhouse) Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity 86 Feet 675 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 19 Feet Andesite March 1993 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 CFS 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet Pool 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 Feet 190 Feet 235 Feet 190 Feet 200 Feet 1 @ 5,000 kw 1 @ 48,000 kw 1 @ 59,500 kw 8 @ 60,000 kw each '8 @ 66,500 kw each 2 @ 13,100 kw each 1,145,700 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute 86 Feet 669 feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Feet Tainter 50 ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 28-46 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line The Dalles Lock and Dam, OR and WA -- Lake Celilo (See Section 46 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area At Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened To Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units 268-257 Feet 276 Feet 500,000 Ac.-ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units 28-47 235 Feet July 1968 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 TABLE 28-0 96-89X4045 APPROPRIATION BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION Expenditures Total Cost To Project FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 Sep 30, 1999 Bonneville Columbia River Fish Mitigation Cougar Detroit Green Peter Hills Creek John Day John Day Rehab Lookout Lost Creek The Dalles Total 0 88,179 197,994 0 6,000,000 0 0 0 6,558 0 0 13,116 0 0 12,124 0 0 7,544 19,723 8,277 130,229 0 0 0 0 0 15,694 0 0 702 0 2,226,139 1,882,171 19,723 8,322,595 2,266,132 28-48 416,161 0 9,955 143,205 85,027 7,463 612,077 157,294 95,001 1,621 2,646,696 4,174,500 1,668,674 0 3,992 254,025 835,485 1,976 1,813,742 811,937 162,810 0 2,229,793 7,782,434 2,371,008 6,000,000 20,505 410,346 932,636 16,983 2,584,048 969,231 273,505 2,323 8,984,799 22,565,384 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT* This District comprises Washington State except south- Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape ern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and north- Disappointment, and to the Columbia River above Yakima western Montana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Miscellaneous 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA..........................................29-2 2. Blair Waterway, Tacoma, WA ................................. 29-2 3. Ediz Hook, W A ....................................................... 29-2 4. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA .............. 29-2 5. Friday Harbor, WA ...................................... 29-3 6. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA .................... 29-3 7. Lake Crockett, WA................................... .... 29-4 8. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA...........................29-5 9. Neah Bay, WA...................................... 29-5 10. Olympia Harbor, WA .................................. 29-5 11. Port Townsend, WA ............ ...................... 29-6 12. Project Condition Surveys ..................................... 29-6 13. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA.............29-6 14. Quillayute River, WA.................................... 29-7 15. Seattle Harbor, W A ......................... ...................... 29-7 16. Swinomish Channel, WA ..................................... 29-8 17. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, W A .......................... ..................... 29-8 Beach Erosion Control 18. Lummi Shore Road, WA.............................29-9 Flood Control 19. Cedar River, Renton, WA......... ........... 29-9 20. Flathead River, MT... .................... 29-9 21. Howard A. Hanson Dam ........... ........ 29-10 22. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................ 29-10 23. Mud Mountain Dam, WA........................ 29-10 24. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................. ................ 29-11 25. Stillaguamish, River, WA............................ 29-11 26. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA....................... 29-11 Multiple Purpose Power 27. Albeni Falls Dam, ID .................................. 29-11 28. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA ...... 29-12 29. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT ................. 29-12 30. Deepwater Slough, WA .............................. 29-13 31. Porter Levee, WA...................................... 29-13 32. Puget Creek, WA...................................29-13 33. Sammamish River Weir Restoration, WA.......... 29-14 34. Thorton Creek, WA .................................. 29-14 35. Turning Basin #3, Seattle, WA........................29-14 Other Activities 36. Other Work under Special Authorization .......... 29-14 37. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP) ................................................. 29-15 38. General Regulatory Functions Program .......... 29-15 General Investigations 39. Surveys ............................... ............... 29-15 40. Collection and Study of Basic Data................ 29-15 41. Preconstruction Engineering and Design............ 29-15 Tables Table 29-A Cost & Financial Statement .............. 29-17 Table 29-B Authorizing Legislation ................. 29-24 Table 29-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects............................... 29-29 Table 29-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................................... 29-30 Table 29-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects..................................... 29-31 Table 29-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Power Projects........................... 29-34 Table 29-G Other Authorized Miscellaneous Activities.. ................................ 29-34 Table 29-H Other Preconstruction Engineering and Design Projects............................29-34 Table 29-I Deauthorized Projects ................ 29-34 Table 29-J Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA, Principal Features of Double Lock and Dam........29-35 Table 29-K Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858...... 29-36 Table 29-L Miscellaneous Activities Pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662.........29-36 -29-1- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1999 Navigation 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Location. On northern point of Fidalgo Island in Puget Sound, 17 miles south of Bellingham, WA, and 64 miles north of Seattle. The main harbor is on Guemes Channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18427.) Existing project. Channel in Capsante Waterway, 12 feet deep and 150 to 250 feet wide, between east side of Q Avenue and deep water in Fidalgo Bay, a distance of 2,850 feet; a mooring basin 12 feet deep, 570 feet wide, and 960 feet long adjacent to north side of Capsante Waterway, protected by two pile breakwaters, each 470 feet long, east and southeast of basin; and a navigation channel 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide, extending 5,180 feet from deep water in Guemes Channel to the west shore of Fidalgo Bay (construction under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 29-C). Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is about 15.5 feet. Project was completed in January 1977. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1977). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 piers and wharves in the Port of Anacortes, 15 on Guemes Channel, 3 on Capsante Waterway, and 7 on Fidalgo Bay. Three wharves on Guemes Channel are open for public use; of these, one is publicly owned and operated and used for handling general cargo in foreign and domestic trade. In addition, two wharves are used for ferries plying to the San Juan Islands and to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Both are publicly owned and operated. Two of the wharves on Capsante Waterway and basin are publicly owned and operated and used for receiving petroleum products, and as a moorage for fishing and pleasure craft. All other wharves are used for general industrial purposes. In addition, there are two oil-refinery wharves located to the south of Capsante Waterway which are privately owned and operated and used for handling petroleum products in foreign and domestic trade. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Post Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with Port of Anacortes, city of Anacortes, and navigation users. Maintenance, contract: None. 2. BLAIR WATERWAY, TACOMA, WA Location. The waterway is located within the Port of Tacoma on Commencement Bay in south Puget Sound in the northeast section of Tacoma, approximately 30 miles south of Seattle, WA. Existing project. Improvement consists of modifying 2.6 miles of the existing Federal navigation project for the Blair Waterway by deepening the channel and turning basin to -51 feet mean lower low water. Estimated project cost is $4,532,000 ($1,956,000 Federal and $2,576,000 non-Federal), with completion in FY 2000. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Port of Tacoma) will provide 50% of the costs allocated to the general navigation during construction. Concurrent with subject project, the contractor will dredge berth areas at 100% sponsor cost. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed on September 10, 1999. Terminal facilities. There are many terminal facilities located in Tacoma Harbor which is comprised of Commencement Bay and its waterways. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specifications, executed PCA, and initiated construction. New work, contract: Dredging contract under way. 3. EDIZ HOOK, WA Location. Ediz Hook and city of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, WA, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18468.) Existing project. Provides for about 16,400 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and periodic nourishment. Project was completed in October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Of the 27 waterfront facilities at Port Angeles Harbor, 3 are located along the inner side of Ediz Hook. Functional uses of the piers include placing logs into the water from trucks for shipment by rafting; mooring harbor pilot boats, U.S. Coast Guard vessels, Naval Reserve vessels, and occasionally, oceanographic research vessels; and fueling government vessels. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Inspection and coordination with local sponsor. Maintenance, contract: None. 4. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA -29-2- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18444.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23rd Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. Project was completed in April 1963. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with 4 berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. A portion of the East Waterway has been deepened and modified by the U.S. Navy for a Homeport. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Aerial survey of the Jetty Island habitat development site was performed. Prepared plans and specifications for maintenance dredging and awarded contract. Monitored maintenance dredging contract. Maintenance, contract: A continuing contract for pipeline maintenance dredging, awarded in FY 1998, was completed in December. Dredging of the upstream and downstream settling basins resulted in 284,706 cy of shoal material being removed at a cost of $906,773. A portion of the material was rehandled from the city disposal site to the EPA Superfund cleanup site located on the Tulalip Indian Reservation. A continuinmg contract for pipeline maintenance dredging of the upstream settling basin and channel, awarded in September, is underway. 5. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. San Juan Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan Island county seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) Existing project. Concrete floating breakwater (1,600 feet) to protect the existing port facilities and to allow the Port of Friday Harbor to provide 294 additional permanent moorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. Construction was completed in March 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with the Port of Friday Harbor, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. Further coordinated with the Port relative to the scheduled breakwater maintenance in FY 2000. Maintenance, contract: None. 6. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project (including navigation improvements to date). Provides for an entrance channel across the bar and through entrance 600 to 1000 feet wide and 38 to 46 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 36 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet; and removal of 350- foot southwestern extension of the breakwater, replacing it with an 865-foot northeastern extension, and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the southerly entrance, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 29-C. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low -29-3- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1999 water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). ( For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Improved project. Authorized by Section 202 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Project construction was started in April 1990. Completed project features are: deepen and widen 20 miles of existing 30-foot channel across ocean bar (46 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide), through the harbor entrance (46-38 feet deep and 1,000-600 feet wide), through South to Cow Point Reaches (36 feet deep and 350 feet wide); expand and deepen Cow Point and Junction City turning basins; deepen two downstream local berths; construct fish and initial crab mitigation; deepen last four miles of upstream existing 30-foot channel to 32 feet; and expand Cow Point another 50 feet to accommodate large cruise vessels. Modification of Union Pacific Railroad bridge was deleted from project scope in 1995. Construction of final crab mitigation, the last remaining project feature, was initiated in FY 1999 and will be completed in FY 2000. Completion of project is currently scheduled for early 2001. Estimated project cost is $28,100,000 ($18,200,000 Federal; $9,900,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation Agreement with Port of Grays Harbor, local sponsor for Improvement project, was executed on February 16, 1990. The Port is contributing 35 per cent of improved project cost. In complying with terms of local cooperation, the Port is required to furnish lands and diked disposal areas and assure relocation of utility lines. Terminal facilities. There are 20 waterfront facilities (piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which 5 are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade, they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, paper, wood pulp, aluminum ingots, granite, other break bulk commodities, woodchips, conventional general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring company owned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government owned vessels. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Coordinated with Port of Grays Harbor (local sponsor), resource agencies, and Grays Harbor pilots. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredge Yaqumia dredged in the Entrance'and Bar Channels, removing 249,133 cy and 76,187 cy, respectively at a cost of $944,000 and $406,000, respectively. Approximately 95,062 cy of the sandy material from the Entrance Channel was beneficially used as offshore nourishment in Half Moon Bay to reduce erosion adjacent to the South Jetty and at Westport. All of the material dredged by the Yaquina from the Bar Channel was beneficially used to nourish the offshore area of South Beach located to the south of South Jetty. Plans and specifications were prepared for the maintenance dredging and a 1,900 foot reventment extension at Westport. Crab mitigation sites were surveyed for juvenile crab to determine mitigation credit. Maintenance, contract: The Westport revetment was extended 1,900 feet to the west with placement of 106,970 tons of rock at a cost of $2,414,242. As part of the contract, the Westport revetment and the groin west of the viewing platform were rehabilitated by placement of 3,000 tons of rock at a cost of $143,000. The excavation for the revetment extension was used as a disposal site for pumped dredged material and later moved onto the Half Moon Bay beach as nourishment after the juvenile salmonid out-mitigation. Maintenance dredging of the inner harbor by clamshell dredge was completed at a cost of $3,637,875 with 1,414,605 cy of material being removed. Maintenance dredging of the outer harbor by hopper dredge was completed at a cost of $2,331,550 with 544,106 cy of material being removed, of which 133,408 cy was deposited offshore in Half Moon Bay to combat erosion. Contracts were awarded to monitor crab presence in the outer harbor and in Half Moon Bay to refine the University of Washington crab model used in determining crab mitigation requirements due to maintenance dredging and to allow offshore nourishment in Half Moon Bay, repectively. A contract was awarded to monitor the fish mitigation site. 7. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. The lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett vlith an area of about 6 acres and 25 feet deep at mean lower :,